Wednesday, November 24, 2021

High Incidences Of Stillbirths Reported - What's Happening?


There has been reports from Scotland and Canada of a serious spike in stillborn babies. These events are not newsworthy to mainstream media all over the world. Why is that so? Chances are you have'nt heard of it.

Investigation launched into abnormal spike in newborn baby deaths in Scotland ... Herald, Scotland

In September, 21 infants died within 28 days after delivery in Scotland. This breached the country's upper control limit which indicated an abnormal causation. It recorded 4.9 deaths per 1,000 which is a level never seen in the last 40 years. The authorities are investigating and no further information is provided as to whether the mothers have been vaccinated or contracted covid.

Stillbirths Exploding Across Canada in Fully Vaccinated Mothers .... Bright Light News

Doulas (bet you don't know this word -- these are women, typically without formal obstetric training, who are employed to provide guidance and support to a pregnant woman during labour, who stay by the side of the patients they are assigned to.) reported an alarming increase of stillborn babies in British Columbia, Canada. Lions Gate Hospital in Vanouver recently had 16 stillbirths within 24 hours.  Here's Dr. Daniel Nagase talking about these 16 deaths and another 86 stillbirths in Waterloo, Ontario in a 6 month period. The mothers of the 86 deaths in Waterloo were all fully vaccinated.



Generally, most countries have managed to lower the rate of stillborn babies very considerably over the years due to improved health services and technology.  Most common causes of neonatal death are infection, prematurity, and suffocation, but factors such as smoking during pregnancy or disruption to early intervention services including health visiting and midwifery also increase the risk.

Governments and the mainstream media do not want the slightest hint of vaccination to be associated in this development. No doubt lots of possibilities may be conjured, including the effect of the covid itself.  Coming during the pandemic, the causation is either the vaccine or the virus.

Viral infection by an expectant mother can have adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects. Viruses very rarely cross the placenta barrier, but if they do, they can cause severe defects and fetal death, thus miscarriages and stillbirths. 

As for mRNA and adenovirus vector vaccines, I blogged on this here :Safety Of mRNA Vaccine For Pregnant Women Based On Study With Wrong Premise - New Study Says Risk Extremely High Pfizer knew the spike proteins do not remain in the deltoid muscles where the vaccine is injected. Japanese scientists have shown the spike proteins end up in certain parts of the body including reproductive organs. What are the long term consequences, nobody knows. But the vaccines are very safe, as our governments have told us, who in turn were told by Big Pharma.

Is this the manifestation of explosion of pregnancy problems as predicted by many scientists who warned about the dangers of the new technology vaccines? Form your own opinions or wait for results of investigations which will never be published.

 


Friday, November 19, 2021

Covid Cases High In Highly Vaccinated, And Low in Lowly Vaccinated Countries!

Here are some of the world's headlines. Perplexed is an understatement as Covid case surges in countries with high vaccination rates do not make sense. Are these one off cases or is there a pattern? If it is a pattern, what conclusions can be drawn?

"COVID-19: Cases on the rise. Public urged to avoid large gatherings" (Gibraltar - 100% fully vaccinated).. 12 Nov 2021
"Pfizer Child Vaccine Clears Hurdle; Irish Surge: Virus Update" (Ireland - 75,4% fully vaccinated) ... 2 Nov 2021
"COVID-19: Ireland's Co Waterford has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world - so why are cases surging?" (99.5% of adults fully vaccinated) ... 6 Nov 2021.
Vermont (US State) has the highest vaccination rate in the country (72%). So why are cases surging?"  ABC, 12 Nov 2021
"Singapore reaches 80 pc double-vaccination rate but life is not returning to normal"  ABC, 13 Sep 2021

Slowly and reluctantly the health authorities are getting round to the reality -- the vaccines don't work. Bill Gates and Dr Fauci have recently admitted, at last. Well, they are not actually saying vaccines don't work. The excuse is the vaccines wane in 2-6 months, a claim never supported by any hard evidence.

Is there any evidence that countries that achieved high vaccination rates have high cases? I did a deep dive and plotted the scatter graph based on data as at 17 Nov 2021. 

If the vaccines work, the scatter-graph of all countries should show a distribution similar in the chart here. The countries will mostly cluster in the 2 yellow coloured quadrants. The left-top quadrant are countries with HR (high vax rate) and LC (low cases) and the right-bottom are countries with LR (low vax rate) and HC (high cases). This is just simple logic. The HR-LC and the LR-HC quadrants would tend to be the normal distribution to be expected if vaccination works. Where there is a high rate of vaccination, the cases ought to be low, and vice versa, where the vaccination rates are low, the cases ought to be high.

The situation as at 17 Nov 2021 defies simple logic.



The world average cases per capita basis is 3,239 per 100,000. The weighted average fully vaccinated rate is 41.34%. The chart is divided into 4 quadrants based on these 2 criteria.

Surprisingly, there are 2 big clusters in the HR-HC and the LR-LC quadrants. These are anomalies.

HR-HC quadrant:
106 countries have fully vaccinated above world average of 41.34%. Of the HR (High Rate) countries, 82 or 77% have high cases (HC). The total number of countries making the chart is 205. Of these 205 countries, 38% are in the HR-HC quadrant.This makes a good case for the claim that countries with higher vaccination rates have higher cases. The top 8 countries with the highest vaccination rates in the world have High Cases. Gibraltar has 100% adults fully vaccinated yet it has a HC rate of 19,482 cases per 100,000. The Seychelles has the 2nd highest HC rate in the world of 22,909 cases per 100,000 despite a fully vaccinated rate of 78.6%.

Singapore is the 3rd highest vaccinated country in the world with 86.4% fully vaccinated. The case rate is 4,046 per 100,000, a borderline case in the HR-HC quadrant. Singapore is moving fast to the ignonimous right in the HR-HC quadrant. If current trend of new daily cases of 3,400 continues, in 2 months time, Singapore will be where Malaysia is today at 7,747 cases per 100,000..

LR-LC quadrant:
The so-called African enigma is apparent in this quadrant. Onchocerciasis or river blindness, is caused by the parasitic worm Onchocerca volvulus. It is transmitted through repeated bites by blackflies of the genus Simulium. This is prevalent in many countries in Africa, especially the sub-tropical regions where the disease is endemic. Ivermectin is used widely to control this disease. This quadrant is populated by many African states. All 31 countries where onchocerciasis is endemic are in this quadrant.  This fuels the suggestion that Ivermectin use may have something to do with it.

Why COVID-19 is not so widely spread in Africa? How does Ivermectin affect it? Rodrigo Guerrero et al did a study on the differences between APOC (states that took part in the African Programme for Onchocerciasis Control) and non-APOC countries. (Published Dec 2020 Read Here). Their conclusion:
"The incidence in mortality rates and number of cases (from Covid) is significantly lower among the APOC countries compared to non-APOC countries. That a mass public health preventive campaign against COVID-19 may have taken place, inadvertently, in some African countries with massive community ivermectin use is an attractive hypothesis."

Hisaya Tanioka et al did a study on the African enigma and their report was publiched Mar 2021(Read here). Their conclusion: "The morbidity and mortality in the onchocerciasis endemic countries are lesser than those in the non-endemic ones. The community-directed onchocerciasis treatment with ivermectin is the most reasonable explanation for the decrease in morbidity and fatality rate in Africa. In areas where ivermectin is distributed to and used by the entire population, it leads to a significant reduction in mortality."

India and Indonesia, the two countries whose health system almost collapsed under the onslaught of the Delta strain, switched to Ivermectin and very quickly brought the situation under control. Is it a coincidence these countries are also in this LR-LC quadrant?


(Note: Onchocerciasis endemic countries are highlighted in yellow)

Monday, November 15, 2021

PFIZER EMPLOYS DECEIT IN VACCINE FOR CHILDREN YOU PROBABLY AREN'T EVEN AWARE OF


US - 13-year-old dies in sleep after getting COVID-19 vaccine; CDC investigating
Germany - 12-Year Old Child Dies 2 Days After Receiving The Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine
Thailand - Teen dies from blood clots after second jab
On 10 May 2021 FDA approved the use of the emergency vaccines for children ages 12 to 15. In super quick time 18 May, like a sheep, MOH followed suit (See Chanel News Asia). Singapore HSA analysed the data in super efficient 7 days and considered the test vaccines safe for children. Somehow the extremely low infection rate of this age group justifies the various risks of vaccine adverse reactions already well documented. I mentioned in previous blogs that Pfizer's website for Comirnaty did not recommend its use for children in this age group. Pfizer was saying use their no-liability Pfizer-BioNtech Covid19 vaccine label for the kids but not the Comirnaty label. Why that anomaly never bothered MOH at all is a wonder. Pfizer has since revamped the website.

23 June 2021 MOH announced it was going to receive the first batch of FDA approved vaccine Comirnaty. (See Straits Times.) On 23 Aug 2021 FDA approved Comirnaty. The first thing I want to ask MOH is how on Earth did they arrange for the first batch of Comirnaty in May when the FDA approved it 3 months later? Does MOH have some crystal ball or is there some international collusion going on?

I have explained in previous blogs that Comirnaty is a scam, a US political ploy to fool the masses to vaccinate. There is no Comirnaty in the market. Pfizer are'nt so stupid to market Comirnaty where they have liabilities when they can sell the same formulation under the label Pfizer-BioNtech Covid 19 vaccine which carries no liabilities as it's sold under emergency use. MOH cannot show us the Comirnaty that they supposedly received. Why does the Singapore government collaborate in the US trickery?

Since Comirnaty has been approved, can the MOH explain why are they still using other untested vaccines under emergency use? If an approved drug for a disease is available, why use other untested options?

In the US there is a court case going on currently. More than 350,000 US Army personnel are suing the Secretary of Defence for the unconstitutional vaccine mandate. In the course of the proceedings, it was revealed soldiers were jabbed with Pfizer-BioBtech Covid-19 vaccine, but recorded as Comirnaty-vaccinated. MOH has overcome this problem by a sleigh of hand. It simply uses one definition Pfizer-BioNtech Covid-19/Comirnaty. To MOH it does'nt matter which one you take because they are the same formulation. True, but the legal status is different. If you take Comirnaty, you may want to sue Pfizer if you sustain any injury. The truth of the matter is, there is no Comirnaty, and MOH knows it. Why all this trickery in both US and Singapore?

When they come for your 5 year olds, for goodness sake, make your decision with full knowledge which MOH does not offer.

In October 2021, the FDA approved the use of vaccines for children in age group 5-11. Good Lord, despite the fact infection rate is even lower in this group, will MOH kowtow and follow the US? Precedence says YES. There is no more independent thinking.

Pfizer prepared a document for the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting on 26 Oct 2021 to approve the Pfizer vaccine for children aged 5-11. It is a 39 page report (Read (FDA website here) In this document, Pfizer slipped in the following by stealth:

" To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine buffer instead of the phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.">

As blood clot is a high risk side effect for younger people, Pfizer has added a new ingredient called tromethamine. This is a drug to prevent cardiac arrests. It is a sort of blood thinner. If you send your children to take a vaccine against a virus for which their natural immunity is very well capable of handling, and have to inject something to prevent cardiac arrest, a condition which they do not have, does that not sound incredulously silly and dim witted?

So when they come for your five-year olds, consider that adverse effects of tromethamine may include respiratory depression, local irritation, tissue inflammation, injection site infection, febrile response, chemical phlebitis, venospasm, hypervolemia, IV thrombosis, extravasation (with possible necrosis and sloughing of tissues), transient decreases in blood glucose concentrations, hypoglycemia, and hepatocellular necrosis with infusion via low-lying umbilical venous catheters -- take your pick. On top of this, don't discount all the other known adverse effects of mRNA vaccines.

You might want to ask MOH if they are aware of the use of tromethamine and do they object? You might also ask MOH how are they going to administer the vaccine? Tromethamine on its own is intravenously administered. The mRNA vaccine is injected into the deltoid muscles. What are the consequences of injecting into the muscles a drug which is supposed to be given intravenously? MOH? Anyone?

Do your own research. You owe that to your children.


Related blogs:


Friday, November 12, 2021

Baking Soda And Covid - Everything To Gain, Nothing To Loose

A couple of years back, I passed by a Filipino couple pulling some grass from the side walk. It instantly clicked on me what they were looking for. For years I had been interested in finding out the name of the particular grass. So I enquired if they knew the name and what it's for. They asked me first what I knew about the grass, so I told them of an incident long ago. I was doing incamp reservist training at the time. Over the weekend off, I visited my mother. She noticed my awkward sitting position and I explained the damn bleeding piles I was having. (People like me soldier on, we don't go get medical leave at the slightest excuse). To which she said in a matter-of-fact way, why did'nt I tell her earlier. Mom asked me to wait as she left the house and returned a few minutes later with what looked like a bunch of ordinary cowgrass in her hand. She brewed a concoction for me which I took just to placate her as I had not the slightest tiny bit of faith that something from a cow's menu could solve my nasty butt problem. To my pleasant surprise, the very next day, the bleeding stopped. On the following day, the piles were in recession. The Filipino lady confirmed the theraupetic use and shared that she learnt about it from her previous Taiwanese boss. The name of the grass is Paragis.

Grandma's remedies really worked in the past. I can tell of how my mom pulled a 3 inch protruding rusty nail off my feet and patched the wound with cactus pulps and no tetanus visited me. How my dad took care of some nasty wounds that was festing with maggots using nothing but some leaves mashed with porridge. And more.

In the covid pandemic, there are those who tested positive and sent back to home quarantine with just some panadols. In the early and mild stages, some therapeutic protocoals would have helped greatly. As Ivermectin is denied, many are left clueless what to do except wait for the infection to get full blown and then admit to hospital. Some resort to TCM (traditional Chinese medicine), most just take on whatever to build their immune system.

Louis Pasteur laid the foundations of hygiene, public health and much of modern medicine in the mid 1980s. The Pasteur-world view sees diseases as caused by micro-organisms - virus, bacteria, fungi. Whilst modern medicine has helped us tremendously in the past 140 years or so, it has also led to toxicity from drug dependency, The naturopath-world view rejects evidence-based medicine for natural remedies to help the body heal itself.  Naturopathic medicine has been around for thousands of years. There are much ancient wisdom that lies untapped.

Baking soda, which is sodium bicarbonate, first came to be used as food ingredients in 1846. Grandmas soon learnt that it has medicinal values for poison ivy, leucorrhoea, lumbago, colds and flu. Those who are having a mild symptom of covid may wish to consider using baking soda, together with whatever theraupetic drugs.  Take as follows :

1. By steam inhalation - Boil a pot of water and pour 2 or 3 big spoonful of baking soda in and stir well. Inhale the steam for a few minutes. Be careful not to put the face too near the solution when steaming hot. Do this twice a day for 7 days.

2. By ingestion - Pour 1/2 teaspoonful of baking soda into a glass of cool water and drink it. It is tasteless. To make it more palatable, squeeze a bit of lemon. Take 6 times on day one (2 hour intervals), 4 times on day 2, and once daily in the morning after that till well.

Our body cellular activities maintain pH level at certain optimal levels. Different parts of the body has different levels - eg the skin pH is about 5+, blood is 7.4. The environment, things we consume, lifestyle, radiation, etc has an acidic effect on our body. An acidic body is a factory for viruses which is why the pH level of the body must be maintained. Sodium bicarbonate assists in raising the alkalinity of the body. Baking soda is the easiest and cheapest source of sodium bicarbonate you can lay your hands on. The Arm & Hammer brand claims to use pure sodium bicarbonate.

If taking baking soda sounds queer to you, understand that it is sodium bicarbornate which is one of the natural essential minerals our body needs. It's as natural as taking bananas for the potassium. If you go buy an alkaline drink, it's just a drink with baking soda added. Some folks spend thousands of dollars on a machine to connect to the pipe to produce alkaline water. It's the same thing. I have been taking one glass of water with 1/3 teaspoonful baking soda as a prophylactic for some time now. I notice I have better sleep now whereas before, I used to wake up every 1 or 2 hours. It seems also to have a beneficial effect on gastrointestinal upsets. I have a week GI issue having tummy upsets often, now I don't need the Poh Chay Yee or Dhamotil pills.

Before science-addicted skeptics show their disdain, a little known fact may be useful. Sodium Bicarbonate has been used as a treatment measure in pathological respiratory conditions such as cystic fibrosis and chlorine gas inhalations. Its safety, tolerability and efficacy in improvement in those clinical conditions have been well established. In the 1918 Spanish Flu which killed 50 million people, sodium bicarbonate was eventually used as a therapy. It was applied intravenously. (Read Standford University article here).

A peer-reviewed study was published by Kshitij Mody, Welcare Hospital, India on 19 Mar 2021 which claimed a statistically significant reduction (74%) in severity of symptoms of mild to moderate cases of covid-19 treated with 8.4% sodium bicarbonate steam inhalation as an adjuvant to standard covid treatment protocol. (Read here).

There are known warnings to those suffering high blood pressure and renal problems to avoid high levels of sodium bicarbonate. However, a recent study by Kalani L Raphael et el was published in 2016 in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology  (Read here and here). This study showed a surprising finding that having sufficient levels of sodium bicarbonate, or bicarbonate in your body fluids can reduce your chances of an early death. Low levels of sodium bicarbonate can be linked to an increased risk for premature death by 24 percent. Sodium bicarbonate is the main buffer for metabolic, dietary, environmental and respiratory acidic waste.


And finally, here's a first hand account. Mrs Edna Boone was about 10 years old when the Spanish Flu hit. Her township was hit very badly. People were sick and dying in her community. The living had to help look after the sick, like providing food. Her father farmed a plot of land they had with potatoes to feed the neighbours. Edna was tasked with bringing food to the homes of the sick. Everyone one in the community had family members who perished. All except Edna's household, Everyone in her family, including workers, seemed immune. Listen at about 4.35 segment where Edna attributed her family's habit of taking a cup of baking soda water every morning that probably spared their family.

The video was from an interview by Ann Brantley of the Alabama Department of Public Health on 28 Jan 2008 when Edna was 100 years old. Longer life with baking soda!

PS - Don't take my words for it. Do your own research.



Related blogs:

Monday, November 8, 2021

New In Vitro Study Finds mRNA Vaccine Places DNA In Great Jeopardy


Does mRNA vaccine alter our DNA? WHO, FDA, CDC, Fauci, Big Pharma, "experts" from CNN, MSNBC, ABC, Wapo, fact checkers from Facebook, Reuters, Politico, etc etc, our own MOH, and thousands of scientists, just about anybody who has expressed an opinion, have all stated emphatically NO NO NO. And we are all expected to believe so when no one has ever presented any study to support this. This appeal to authority has sucker-punched just about every government in the world.

What if it does, what will the consequences be? A brief intro on cellular biology is necessary so you can better understand what this mRNA technology vaccine is all about and what can go wrong.

Our human cell:

All living things are made up of cells. Humans have an average of 37 million cells. Cells die and are replaced every minute of the day and night. For a growing person, more new cells are generated than lost. As we grow older, lesser new cells are generated. There are all sorts of cells -- skin cells, heart cells, kidney cells, bone cells, etc. Cells grow by division. One kidney cell splits into 2 kidney cells, that's how your kidneys grow. When the cells split, they are exact replicas.



We humans have eukaryotic cells which are cells that have a nucleus. Unlike plants, our cells have no walls, but a membrane. The cell is filled with a jelly-like fluid called cytoplasm. Floating in the cytoplasm are the nucleus and several organelles, or small organs. Inside this nucleus is where our DNA resides. DNA stands for Deoxyribonucleic acid and it takes the shape of a double-strand helix. All the strings together is called the chromatin. The entire DNA forms our genome which is the genetic code or biological instructions that make each one of us unique, It determines everything about you - why your eyes are brown, black hair, height, etc etc and oh yeah, your life span. If you tweak this DNA, who knows what will happen to you. Damage one part, you may find something funny growing out of your eyes. Cut the telomeres, your life span is shortened. Another critical organ in the nucleus is the nucleolus which produces the ribosomes. Once ribosomes are produced, they exit the nucleus into the cytoplasm. Ribosomes are the protein making factory.

The bad news is, in our everyday life, our DNA gets damaged. This happens with exposures to radiation such as with mammography equipment, dirty electricity, electromagnetic radiation from electronic gadgets, chemicals found in foods and personal care products, excessive sunlight exposure, ionizing radiation of high altitude, 4/5G cell towers, etc. Minor DNA mutations occur spontaneously in all living organisms, These damages can result in the helix string of the DNA breaking. DSB (double string break) is when both strings break. Damaged cells lead to premature cell death. When damaged cells start dividing, it leads to tumour in cells which are cancerous?

The good news is, in a normal healthy person, the cells have pathways to repair itself. It uses either the NHEJ (non-homologous end joint) or the HR (Homologous Recombinant). The genome, which we can think of as the complete DNA compilation of a person, comprises of 3 million bases, 20,000 genes and 23 pairs of chromosome. Homologous means sequential or positional values of these bases, genes, chromosomes in the genome. NHEJ path can be viewed as a short cut method. It has better kinetics but no attention to sequential details. Thus sometimes a mistake can occur. HR is more complicated and it relies on a template so it is not error-prone. Current knowledge of science does not understand why a cell will choose which pathway to repair itself.

mRNA and Protein synthesis :



Another crucial function of the cell is the synthesis (production) of proteins. Think of proteins as the work horses in cellular activities in your body. Proteins are stings of amino acids arranged in a particular sequence and form or shape. The sequence and form determines what function that particular protein is intended. The genetic code for a specific protein is contained at a particular segment of the genome. A copy of that segment is made which is a single strand RNA (ribonucleic acid). Think of it like you make a copy of a particular section of an instructions manual. So this is basically a message to tell the cell what to do, what is the sequence of amino acid, what shape to arrange. Thus it is known as a messenger RNA, or mRNA. The making of this mRNA in the nucleus is call a "transcription".

The mRNA leaves the nucleus into the cytoplasm of the cell. It attaches to a ribosome which is the protein factory. Strings of amino acids are attracted into the ribosome and re-arranged accordingly. This is called the "translation". The ribosome translates the instructions in the mRNA. Think of the re-organising and sequencing of the amino acids like in the Periodic Table.


Mix and match the codes in the Periodic table, you end up with a different non-organic matter. Similarly with the Genetic code. Once the protein is synthesised, it goes to the Golgi Body where it exits the cell into the extracellular environment. The mRNA is destroyed and gobbled up by the lysosomes which are the janitor organelles in the cell.

The RAS (Renin-Angiotensin) System:

The final part of biology that will help you understand covid-19.

RAS regulates the renal blood flow. Kidneys take up a large portion of about 25% of the heart's 's output of blood to discharge nitrogen waste. If blood pressure is low and not enough blood gets through, the kidneys secrete a chemical called 'renin' into the blood stream. The liver produces a protein-hormone called 'angiotensinogen' which converts 'renin' into AGT1 (angiotensin-1). The lungs produce enzyme ACE1 which converts AGT1 into AGT2, the activated form of the hormone. AGT2 travel to the small blood vessels all over the body to constrict them. AGT2 also cause the adrenal gland to despatch another hormone 'aldesterone' to the kidneys causing them to take in more water and salt from the urine. The vascular constriction and retention of more salt water causes blood pressure to rise and restore blood supply to the kidneys.

When pressure is too high, ACE2 is activated and released into the bloodstream.  ACE2 converts AGT2 into AGT1-7 which is a form of antioxidant and vasodilator.  ACE2 thus counteracts ACE1 to reduce the high blood pressure. Thus ACE2 and ACE1 are like yin and yang to regulate blood pressure. 

How the SARS-CoV2 work:

The virus attaches itself to a cell. The corona virus has spikes which are proteins. These spikes dock at a specific receptor of cells known as ACE2 (Angiotensin converting enzyme 2). There are many cells that has this ACE2 receptors in the lungs, nose, mouth, heart, blood vessels, kidneys, liver and gastrointestinal tract.  Once it attaches, the virus enters the cell via the ACE2. Inside the cells, the RNA of the virus hijacks the protein production function to synthesise many duplicates of itself which then exit the cell and go on to attack other cells.

The more ACE2 a person has means the more cells the SARS-Cov2 can colonise. People with commorbidities like hypertension, diabetes and coronary heart diseases, as well as older folks and people who don't exercise, such as the obese, tend to have more ACE2 since they are likely to have higher blood pressure.

Thus a high load of SARS-Cov2 will diminish ACE2, leaving ACE1 to dominate and create an imbalance of AGT2.  The result is high blood pressure, inflammation in lungs, heart, etc and all associated cardiovascular issues.  It follows that this group tend to have more severe symptoms of covid.

How the mRNA vaccine works:

If an mRNA could be injected into a cell, then it is possible to hijack it and instruct the cell to produce a specific protein. In 1987, Robert Marlone was the first to discover that fatty oil could be used to deliver an mRNA into a living cell. Today, lipid nano particles are used as the delivery mechanism.

So a vaccine could be made by extracting the mRNA of a virus and getting it into the cell. This is however not scaleable and also the fact the immune system will reject it. By 2005 researches from Harvard University found a way to chemically synthesise mRNA that bypass the immune system. Pfizer and Moderna's vaccines use chemically synthesised mRNA of the SARs-Cov2 virus. However, instead of synthesising the entire virus, they created the mRNA for only the spiked protein part.

When injected into a patients deltoid muscle, the mRNA enters tissue cells. It gets to the ribosome which then synthesises the spiked proteins of the SARS-Cov2. Thus spiked proteins are produced and after a while, the mRNA is deactivated. As the spiked proteins leave the cells, the immune system kicks in and deploys antibodies to kill them. Enough antibodies are built up so when a person is infected with the real virus, they recognise the spiked proteins on the virus as foreign instrusions and kill it.

As protein synthesis happens in the cytoplasm of the cell, the synthesised mRNA of the vaccines do not enter the nucleus and thus do not impact the DNA. That is what we have been told, with no evidence.

SARS–CoV–2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro (read journal here)

This paper was published 13 Oct 2021 by:
Hui Jiang - Dept of Molecular Biosciences, The Wenner–Gren Institute, Stockholm University, Sweden
Ya-Fang Mei - Dept of Clinical Microbiology, Virology, Umeå University, Sweden

In their laboratory experiment on the effects of mRNA vaccines in cells, Jiang-Mei arrived at devastating conclusions. You will reel in horror if you understand what these findings mean.

1. They were surprised to find an abundance of the spike proteins in the nucleus.
The genome is very fragile which is why it is protected in the nucleus. Jiang-Mei basically just told the world that we have all been lied to. A massive amount of spike proteins actually entered the nucleus in vitro. This is an unacceptable event as it puts the integrity of the DNA at stake.  In simple terms, your DNA is being screwed by the spike protein.

2. The spike proteins intensely impede V(D)J recombination.
V(D)J recombination lies at the core of B and T cell translation. This is the production of antibodies. Jiang-Mei shows this cellular function has been intensely impaired by the presence of spike proteins in the cell. A person's adaptive or natural immunity is terribly weakened as a result, leading to autoimmune disorder and all sorts of immunodeficiency issues.

3.The spike proteins significantly diminish the efficiencies of both HR and NHEJ repair pathways by hindering DNA repair protein recruitment.
The test results show its repair capacity is suppressed by as much as 90%! Since the cell cannot do its job properly, this leads to errors in the genome. Such errors may be mixing up of genetic sequence, deletion of certain segment, inserting a wrong code etc. When such damaged cells replicate themselves through division, they lead to cancerous cells, mulfunction of complex organs, accelerated ageing, atrophy.

If the in vitro results hold true in real world, the consequences are fatal for many of those vaxxed. Many may experience extreme damages that will require a lifetime of suffering and medical attention. For many others still, life expectancy is likely shortened. Cancer will proliferate, as will all sorts of cardiovascular disueases, and nuerological problems, If your cells cannot repair, you are dead meat.

We all wish the vaccines work, but this Jiang-Mei report is so mind-blowing it cannot be suppressed. On the basis of this report, I demand that the MOH to immediately cease mRNA vaccinations and conduct its own investigation whether the in vitro study is similarly expressed in real life. Not to do so places all relevant official actors culpable of humanitarian atrocities and homicide should a national tragedy play out.

Thursday, November 4, 2021

Safety Of mRNA Vaccine For Pregnant Women Based On Study With Wrong Premise - New Study Says Risk Extremely High


How safe are the mRNA vaccines for pregnant women and breastfeeding? Pretty safe, so said CDC, and the rest of the world goes along. You might want to do a double take.

The basis for guideline of vaccine use for pregnant women:

Following the use of Johnson & Johnson's covid-19 vaccine in US, 6 women suffered a rare type of blood clot called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis after vaccination. The CDC conducted a review and relied on the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al study, which supported the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy. This has formed the basis for international guidelines for vaccine use in many countries.

Singapore recommendation of vaccine use for pregnant women:

The College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Singapore and the Obstetrical & Gynaecological Society of Singapore issued a joint guideline (June 2021) "Covid-19 vaccination for pregnant women, breastfeeding women and women planning to conceive". The risk-benefits are explained and conclusions are in accord with the CDC. Their review took into consideration various studies including Shimabukuro et el.

Ministry of Health statements on use of vaccine by pregnant women :

* The Expert Committee on COVID-19 Vaccination (EC19V) has examined studies done to monitor women who were vaccinated when they were pregnant, as well as their babies.
* These studies were done on women at different trimesters of pregnancy and there is no evidence to suggest that the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine may cause harm to pregnant women or their babies.
* Both Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are mRNA vaccines. As mRNA vaccines are not live vaccines, they are biologically unlikely to adversely affect breastfed babies.
* In addition, the breast milk of vaccinated mothers may help to protect their babies from COVID-19 due to antibodies in breast milk. There have also been no vaccine-related side effects reported in the babies who were breastfed by mothers who received the vaccine while breastfeeding.

The MP for Jurong GRC Dr Tan Wu Meng had a parliamentary question in Sep 2021. (I'm not quite sure whether this is tabled, or has been discussed in parliament). The question raised and the written answer :

Question: To ask the Minister for Health (a) to date, how many and what proportion of medically eligible pregnant women in Singapore have received an mRNA vaccination against COVID-19; (b) what are the types and frequencies of side effects that have been observed so far; and (c) how does this compare with the experience of other countries.

Answer: The Health Sciences Authority (HSA) has received a small number of non-serious adverse event (AE) reports with the Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty vaccine in pregnant women. These include rash, syncope (fainting), dizziness and one report of Bell’s Palsy (temporary weakness of the facial muscles). These AEs are similar to those reported in the general population. There is currently no evidence of safety concerns when mRNA vaccines are used in pregnant women, based on real-world clinical data. MOH and HSA will continue to monitor both the local and international safety data.

Criticism of Shimabukuro et al:

Study on "Spontaneous Abortions and Policies on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Use During Pregnancy" published Nov 2021 by:
Dr Aleisha Brock Ph.D., MVS, BSc. Whanganui, New Zealand
Dr Simon Thornley Ph.D., MPH(Hons), MBChB. Senior Lecturer, Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Auckland

Brock and Thornley reassessed the report of Shimabukuro et al and determined that "The study presents falsely reassuring statistics related to the risk of spontaneous abortion in early pregnancy, since the majority of women in the calculation were exposed to the mRNA product after the outcome period was defined (20 weeks’ gestation)."

They recalculated the risk of the outcome based on the cohort that was exposed to the vaccine before 20 weeks’ gestation. Their re-analysis indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion 7 to 8 times higher than the original authors’ results. Which means :
Pregnant women who had mRNA vaccination had an incredibly high rate of spontaneous miscarriage -- 92% in the first 13 weeks, 81.9% in the first 20 weeks!!!
On the safety of breastfeeding, the authors recommended great caution as the transmission of mRNA and spike protein across the placenta and through breast milk has never been tested and the effects unknown.

The report calls for the immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and reproduction are established.

Vaccine labels Pfizer-BNT162b2 and Comirnaty :

They are both of the same formulation and manufactured by Pfizer. BNT162b2 is sold under EUA (emergency use authorisation) and Comirnaty is FDA approved. Comirnaty is a political scam. It exists in name only, created for the purpose of receiving an official FDA approval to help dispel fear and vaccine hesitancy to drive the US vaccination mandate. Comirnaty is not marketed at the moment for 2 reasons. (1) By law, once there is an approved drug for a disease, all other EUA drugs must be withdrawn. This has not happened. (2) Pfizer makes billions selling BNT162b2 under EUA where there is a waiver or liability. Why on Earth would they want to sell the approved label Comirnaty and face the possibility of multi-billion dollar suits?

On 23 Jun 2021 Straits Times reported the MOH is expecting to receive a batch of Comirnaty for use in Singapore. A google search is all about Singapore "to receive", there is no news about arrival of the shipment. Surely there would have been some huha if MOH received the approved vaccine, publicity milked to the limit to allay the fears of the vaccine hesitant. Afterall, that was the very purpose. I am deeply skeptical MOH actually received the shipment. MOH has now gone for registration purposes to record anyone taking the Pfizer vaccine under a common category "Pfizer BNT162b2 / Comirnaty". In other words, MOH sees no difference between the two. Physically they are the same formulation, but legally they are not. BNT162b2 carries no manufacturer liability, Comirnaty has liabilities for Pfizer. This imposes a legal issue, a contingency MOH does not consider. Post fact, there will be no basis to establish which label one actually had the jab.

Comirnaty carries this caveat with regards to pregnant women and breast-fed babies :

"..available data on Comirnaty administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine- associated risks in pregnancy”, and “it is not known whether Comirnaty is excreted in human milk” as “data are not available to assess the effects of Comirnaty on the breastfed infant”

This is totally in contradiction to CDC and MOH statements on the use of the vaccine.

Big Pharmas all have a dedicated website for each drug they produce. This is where they put out their fact sheet -- how to use the drug, the ingredients, warnings, etc. Here's the curious case of Comirnaty. Pfizer put up Comirnaty.com when it was approved by FDA. In an earlier blog I mentioned the Corminaty website did not recommend use of the approved label for age 15 and below. They don't want the liability, just as for pregnant women. That website has been totally revamped and it is now basically carrying statements of the CDC or FDA regarding their product. Hands washed off all liabilities, that's what it's all about.

Fudging data and nuanced presentation of statistics:

Trust of information from positions of power and governance is now a big issue. We have seen how NIH, CDC, FDA, Doctors Fauci and Francis Collins, who has now stepped down from NIH, practically lied, concealed, and fabricated information relating to the vaccine and the virus. We have seen how a Lancet report was contrived to support Fauci in his appearance at the Senate inquiry where he lied under oath that the virus was zoonotic. This CDC-supported Shimabukuro et al report now appears to be a similar sham show.

Facebook commenter Goh Meng Seng is a statistician, I am not. My only claim to this crazy numbers world is a statistics paper I sat in my younger days and which I had to resit 3 times because it bored me to sleep at the study table. On Facebook chats, both GMS and myself have consistently warned of how data can be easily misinterpreted, due to bias selection or not taking into account critical context. It could be innocent mistakes, or intentionally nuanced to suit a particular narrative.

For example this pictograph showing 60% un-vaxxed in the ICU was propaganda to warn of the dangers of not getting the jab, had many people easily convinced, including critical minds like hotshot social commentator 'Critical Spectator'.  The fatal flaw lies in the population of the un-vaxx in the ICU. They are mostly the old and with comorbidities who had to avoid vaccination in the first place. The fatal flaws in the Shimabukuro et al report just shows how dangerous it can be to get the statistics wrong.

I have written to the 7 co-authors of the "Covid-19 vaccination for pregnant women, breastfeeding women and women planning to conceive" for their comments on the Broch and Thornley report but have not yet received any response.


Related blogs:

</