THE VILLAGE IDIOT WHO APPROVES OF PAP OPERATING 'PARBUS'

Some time back I had a digital altercation with a young commenter on Facebook who recently called himself a 'Village Idiot', a self-desecration to insinuate that I was dumbing down on him. Since he has professed himself a VI, I shall do him the honours of referring him as such. I was reluctant to waste time on making a mountain out of a molehill, but in the end, I feel there is some important issue worth sharing whilst hopefully, educating VI.

Most folks are familiar with the Polish blogger called Critical Spectator. He is an unabashed fan of the Singapore Government and a prolific writer of all things good with Singapore Inc. I do not agree with some of his points, but I appreciate he writes well and he supports his opinions with data and respectable arguments. I observe CS responds fast to issues of the day and the fact his articles often come with some researched data in such short time betrays someone writing with the support of a team. In other words, he is most likely a paid partisan propagandist. I have told him so, to which he has denied. CS is disliked by many for his opposition party-hating vernacular and his PAP fawning inclination. I note his many detractors seldom take him on which I suspect is due to apprehension of  parrying with him. The result is CS Facebook page is a huge echo chamber of PAP die-hard supporters. I often drop some comments of alternative narratives, which without fail, would attract much criticisms from the echo chamber. To those that present a fair argument, I would respond in kind. But some commenters are best left for their parents to talk to them.

There was an argument I had with VI when I commented on a Facebook post by Critical Spectator. It started off rather arrogantly on his part, but civility thankfully prevailed. A statement I made required of me to show proof to him and led me to making a joke of a S$1,000 challenge. I reneged on that challenge due to pressing matters of putting food on the table, and not discounting the fact that I had already shown him the legislation in question but from which he could not, or was too lazy to read through, to find the answer himself. I put the matter off my mind, but it seems VI began trolling me. Each time I made a comment in another post of CS, there he was reminding me of the S$1k challenge. He is there at all times to render in disrepute all my other comments. I have a feeling VI is a paid IBs troll whose job it is to track people identified as anti-PAP (I am not anti-PAP, I am against some issues) and clobber our alternative narratives. I believe this army is not out to clobber everyone, but only sticky to those who presents alternative narratives intelligently.

Our dispute was in respect of the AIM saga. To recap, the $2 paid up company AIM landed the IT consultancy project of the PAP constituencies. In his media statement 2 Jan 2013, MP Teo Ho Pin, as Chairman of the PAP-run Town Councils, said of AIM  "... we were confident that AIM, backed by the PAP, would honour its commitments."  Later on 15 May 2013, Minister Khaw reiterated in parliament that AIM was owned by the PAP. In the Critical Spectator FB post I made a comment the PAP broke laws if indeed they owned AIM.  The Village Idiot challenged me to provide the proof to which I directed him to the Societies Act. I think he expected me to show him a legislation that explicitly says "PAP cannot operate a commercial enterprise". Of course there is no such legislation. It required a somewhat lengthy explainer to demonstrate my claims. I didn't have time for IBs.

I blogged on the AIM saga here : PAPsmear - The Big Lie About The AIM Saga

In exasperation of the persistent trolling, I felt I needed a full blog to hopefully educate the Village Idiot and at the same time, share a learning moment with everyone else.

The Societies Act Section 24 states the Minister may order dissolution of any society
(1) Whenever it appears to the Minister that —
(c) any registered society is being used for purposes incompatible with the objects and rules of the society.

This ruling is thus predicated on the constitution of the People's Action Party. Article II of the PAP Constitution on Party Objectives:

"The Party shall be a national movement dedicated to serving our nation and advancing the well-being of our people. Towards this end, the Party’s objectives are: –
(a) To preserve, protect and defend the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Singapore.
(b) To safeguard the freedom, and advance the well-being, of Singaporeans through representative and democratic government.
(c) To uphold a multi-racial and multi-religious society, where people of diverse backgrounds and beliefs live harmoniously together as fellow citizens, and deepen our national identity and commitment to Singapore;
(d) To sustain a vibrant economy which creates good jobs and better lives for all, and enables every Singaporean to achieve their full potential;
(e) To build a fair and just society, which encourages individual effort and family responsibility, while ensuring community and government support for the vulnerable and less fortunate;
(f) To strengthen an open and compassionate meritocracy, with opportunities for Singaporeans to develop skills in diverse fields, active support for those who start off with less, and ladders to success at every stage of life;
(g) To develop a democracy of deeds, where citizenship embodies both rights and duties, and nurtures a sense of collective responsibility and community action;
(h) To represent and serve all Singaporeans responsively and responsibly, attentive to immediate concerns, focussed on long-term challenges and opportunities, and governing with integrity and honesty. "

These are 8 noble objectives. Nowhere is mentioned about investments and doing business. As clear as day, Section 24 (1) (c) applies if PAP actually owns AIM. It is ultra vires the party constitution. In my exchanges with Village Idiot, I said 'you break laws, you go to jail". The legal consequence here is actually worse. The PAP is liable to dissolution under the Societies Act.

The 2 founder shareholders of AIM were PAP members Lau Ping Shum and Chandra Das. I am assuming PAP, being a party of smart scholars with impeccable integrity, will not violate Section 24 (1) (c) of the Societies Act. Thus Lau and Das almost certainly held equity in AIM in their personal capacity and in pursuit of entrepreneurial dreams. The party had nothing to do with AIM. That being the case, the whole AIM mess can be summed up with 3 breaches by the men-in-white:
(1) Terrible conflict of interest by Lau and Das, collaborated by 17 PAP MPs running those constituencies.
(2) Mis-information by Dr Teo Ho Pin in his media statement 2 Jan 2013
(3) Outright lie by Minister Khaw in parliament on 15 May 2013.

I was terribly disappointed that Khaw's Big Lie went unchallenged. What should have been a huge public outcry went without so much as a whimper. The press didn't pick that up. Opposition members remained silent. Should Worker's Party remain silently indignant in light of the recent Committee of Privileges report against them regarding the lies in parliament of opposition MP Raeesah Khan?

Back to my main story about the Village Idiot. He is adamant no laws were broken, that the party can do business. Unfortunately for his ego, but good for Singaporeans, the government has done well to establish very stringent rules regarding how political parties can raise funds from members, receive donations for election campaigns, accept political contributions, etc. I shall not digress into the details, but suffice to say, there is nothing that permits political parties to own commercial enterprises.

The lesson to share here, and hopefully the Village Idiot has enough humility and critical capacity to think through the error of his comments. What he was referring to is something political science lingo calls "Parbus" which stands for political "Parties in Business". It does seem he is in favour of parbus, which runs counter to his patron party the PAP, which has most wisely chosen a practice never to allow in Singapore. Parbus is the fusion of politics and business, and the most assured pathway to corruption on a massive scale. Village Idiot is probably too young to remember the days when our neighbour up North practiced parbus, with UMNO, Indian Congress and Malaysian Chinese Association all having their own businesses. I wonder if he knows about the MCA, its president Tan Sri Tan Koon Swan and their powerful conglomerate Multi-Purpose Holdings and the financial mess they had back in the good old days.

Do note I meant no disrespect using the name Village Idiot. That's what he called himself. I rather not doxx on him. Unfortunately, VI is symtomatic of the young liberal-educated prevalent today. They pray to the altar of Relativism, and like John Keats, believe "Knowledge enormous makes a God of me". And so they often err to work through ethical and moral issues.

SINGAPORE TOO TRIGGER HAPPY TO SANCTION RUSSIA FOR GOOSE-STEPPING INTO UKRAINE

As Russia goose-stepped into Ukraine, Singapore reached into its toolbox of foreign policies for small nations and rolled out the chi hua hua doctrine. Tiny that they are, chi hua huas often put on an aggressive stance with noisy barks as a way of territorial protection. Singapore is one of the first countries in the world to unilaterally sanction Russia. The agitprop for the day is small nations like Singapore must stand behind international laws as a defence against illegal invasion by a stronger state. Like the chi hua hua, the announcement to sanction had to be bold and highly publicised. A high fallutin speech at the United Nations earned our UN ambassador an appreciative hug from the Ukrainian representative.

My immediate thought was it was all meant for domestic consumption. Too many issues that have political undercurrent have infested, such as CECA, Parti Liyani case, the pandemic, persecution of Worker's Party, rising cost of living, etc. It is opportune time to remind the population of the precarious situation of a small country. A standard prescription of distraction is what the good doctor recommended in times such as this.

By now it is very evident, Singapore goes to bed with the globalist elites. The pandemic frustrated the 2021 World Economic Forum that was to be held in Singapore, which would have marked the first time it was ever held outside Davos, and of great significance to hold up the Lion City as a shining example of what an open global city can achieve. Does Singapore act to the bidding of the globalist ? Singapore's rush to judgement and sanctions reminds me of the wide-eyed fawning student that sits in the front row, ever ready to put up a hand to whatever the teacher wanted.

I wonder if there is an inner cabinet that sits to discuss such serious matters before the Foreign Minister is allowed to broadcast the sanction against Russia. It would be nice to be the spider on the wall. Difficult times like this is when  elder statesmen step out to share their views and offer their wisdom. Others step up to clarify and support the government decision in the face of domestic criticism. Prof Tommy Koh wrote an op-ed in the Straits Times  The war in Ukraine and the laws of war 18 Mar 2022. It's an ivory tower legalistic piece and of course Russia broke every law that Koh could dig up. Kishore Mahbubani he is not, and of course as ambassador-at-large, Koh understands well he who pays the piper calls the tune.

The two personalities that I deem are the rare thinkers of Singapore are Kishore Mahbubani and George Yeo. It should not pass without my highlighting that both these deep thinkers seem to hold views not aligned with the government in this Russo-Ukraine conflict. Back in June 2021, Kishore had candidly warned against siding with Nato in their attempt to inject themselves into the Pacific Region. In his article 'Asia, say NO to Nato' Kishore reiterated "The Pacific has no need of the destructive militaristic culture of the Atlantic Alliance". In his recent 19 Mar 2022 brilliant opinion article 'Ukraine War : Where are the peacemakers?' Kishore agreed Russia acted illegally and ought to be condemned. He said "Since geopolitics is a cruel game and follows the cold and ruthless logic of power, we must be cold, dispassionate and hard-headed in our analysis. The only iron law of geopolitics is that it punishes those who are naive and ignore its cold logic."  It is his 'Power looks down from the barrel of a gun' analogy, and with the ever subtlety of a veteran diplomat, Kishore let's you guess who are the 'naive' he refers to.

George Yeo, on the other hand, simply shared a video that leaves no doubt his sentiments are at odds with the Foreign Minister who now warms the same chair he once sat.

Suddenly everyone is an expert on the Russo-Ukraine war. I wonder if the ordinary guys see it as war amongst brothers and cousins. Since the Middle Ages when the Norsemen or Vikings from the Scandinavian region came south into Central Europe, all the way down into the Caspian Seas and do battle with the Byzantine Romans, they and the Slavic peoples, Tartars, Huns, Turkic Khazaars have their DNAs churned in cauldrons over the centuries, it is difficult to say who really owns the Land of the Rus. Throw in a huge diaspora of Jewish people if it is not complicated enough. I don't pretend to know their history and I don't see how one can dissect the truth from the filth that's coming from untrustworthy press and funny tik-tok videos. I merely wish to share a few points for a more learned perspective of the official Singapore position.

George Sorros asked the world to get on board the Ukranian side. What I know is, when the Devil ask to do one thing, we should be doing the exact opposite. The CIA, Nato and people like Sorros have been playing Ukraine for decades. It is difficult for the West to infiltrate Russia, or USSR in the past. The only way they could do so was through the Stasi network, the Nazi secret police organisation in Ukraine. This network remained very powerful to this day, and even has its own Azor Battalion, an extreme far right military detachment that terrorises its own citizens. The German Strafgesetzbuch section 86a bans pro-Nazi organisations and the symbolisms, but the CIA and Nato work with the Ukranian neo-Nazis. The Swastika flags fly all over Ukraine. Is Putin wrong to say he wants to de-Nazify Ukraine?

In 2010 Victor Yanuykovych was elected president. This displeased Nato and President Obama as Yanuykovych was pro-Russia. Sorros' Open Society poured in money to fund social activism. Together with CIA, the west engineered the Maidan Revolution of 2014. The US ambassador Victoria Nuland (currently Biden's Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs) was on video seen handing out donuts to demonstrators in the streets. Petro Poroshenko was installed as President in 2014 and happy days were back again as Obama had his man in place. US aid money poured in, Hunter Biden got his cut which he shares with the "Big Guy" sitting in the White House today. I suppose the Singapore government in 2014 shared the jubilation of the US, never the worry of Putin who saw an enemy worked a successful regime change in a country next door.

John Kerry, Mitt Romney, Bidens, Nancy Pelosi, Clintons and George Sorros have two things in common. They all had their hands in the Ukrainian cookie jar and they all want other people's sons, husbands, and fathers to go fight and die for Ukraine. In 2014, after the Maidan Revolution and President Yanuykovych had fled to Russia, John Kerry (as Obama's Sec of State) visited Ukraine and offered the new government US$1b aid. Kerry's chief fundraiser Devon Archer, visited Joe Biden (who was Obama's front man for Ukraine) in the White House. The Veep then made a trip to Ukraine, following which Devon Archer and Hunter Biden both joined the board of Burisma, the Ukranian oil giant. (Devon, Hunter and John Kerry's stepson Chris Heinz, are all in Seneca Rosemount, the private equity firm swinging deals with the CCP). Mitt Romney's top aide Joseph Cofer Black, who also worked in CIA under Presidents Bill Clinton and George Bush, also served on Burisma's board. Nancy Pelosi's son Paul Pelosi Jr was on the board of Visoil, getting paid thousands for a window executive job. As for the Clintons, they received millions for the Clinton Foundation over the years from oligarchs like Victor Pinchuk and Igor Kolomoisky. Sorros betted huge on Hillary Clinton and taking over Ukraine via control over their gas and energy industry. He poured in billions, and lost when Trump won the 2016 election.

Trump presented a major problem for corrupt US establishment politicians and Sorros. He had to go. The fake Russian Collusion had many plots that originated in Ukraine, funded by several US billionaires including Sorros, and executed by Democrat operatives, supported by US deep state. It was some Ukranian fake dossier that put Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort behind bars. The story is still unfolding as John Durham's indictments work its way through the courts. What is clear is Ukraine, beholden to Obama aid money, allowed itself to be played to interfere in another country's election.

One wonders whether our Foreign Minister Vivian Balakhrisnan, had all the intel on Ukraine to make a right decision. Or is our government being played, or even worse, Singapore is a partner in the globalist agenda.

There are some praises for Singapore government making a brave and cold hard decision to sanction Russia. It was doubtless a cold hard decision, made easier by the fact Russian-Singapore trade is minuscule. Just wondering out loud what would the decision be had Russia been our say number 5th trading partner? Cash register has a way of making hypocrites out of folks.

As for Singapore Airlines which jumped in quickly behind the government to ban flights to Russia, it was an easy decision since the bottomline of SIA doesn't make one bit of difference to CEO Goh Choon Pong's multi-million dollar remuneration. SIA was quick to assimilate the kind of Western cancel culture that is, well, killing Western culture today.

Small nations try to garner strength in numbers through international alliances. Singapore has mostly expressed neutrality through the Non-Aligned Nations organisation and Asean. The hasty sanction against Russia without consultation with the two associations may have irked some. If one groups the countries, it does seem the rich and developed countries are pro-Ukraine. Singapore voted with the rich. This has certainly not gone un-noticed by our neighbourhood poor and developing countries.

The aftermath of the Russo-Ukraine war will never be business as usual. There will be teutonic geopolitical shifts. The world has seen through the 'militaristic culture' of the globalist elite leadership of the west, the meddlesome US, the western press propaganda, and how financial and economic institutions are weaponised. The world now understands that no one holding western assets are safe. The Russia-China suggestion of a new multi-lateral grouping without the western-axis countries seems appealing. Will a bi-polar world emerge -- a Western axis countries facing off the rest of the world possibly led by Russia/China. The Yuan is definitely not capable of taking on the role of world reserve currency in the short term, but the future of US$ as reserve currency is dead. The trust is gone forever. Will the world gravitate towards China for world leadership is a question that depends very much on how the CCP handle the Taiwan debacle. If it capitalises on US weakness and takes over Taiwan militarily, it will be viewed as a similar Russian invasion of Ukraine. If it does not, the CCP will gain tremendous respect.

The teutonic geopolitical shifts will see various new economic and financial initiatives and groupings. Singapore may well find itself unwelcome at worse, and at best, a mere participant with no over-sized role. Take for example, the Artic Council. The melting ice cap will open up new shipping routes in the future which will substantially impact our importance as a maritime trading post. With good foresight, Singapore had joined the council as an observer, and recently upgraded to full member. It was thought Singapore has the finance, development, and ship-building expertise to offer as the Artic countries began building the infrastructure for the new trade routes. With much of the route passing along Russian coastal lands, will there be Singapore Inc projects in Siberian ports? Another example is the question of a more reliable world reserve currency. The US$ is dead meat in the long term. Whatever may replace the US$, will there be a role for Singapore to sustain our position as a leading financial market in the world?

Just a sobering thought. When all the dust is finally settled, will Singapore find itself on the wrong side of history?

Related blog:
Singapore sanctions Russia - A betrayal of First Principles in foreign relations

THE GREATEST 'GRAND JURY' IN HUMAN HISTORY (DAY 2)

Those with a critical mind would have been acutely aware of a paradigm shift in the way Covid19 has been managed when compared to past pandemics in 2 major ways :

Firstly, patient diagnosis has always been done by attending physicians who observe symptoms, and make individualised prescriptions accordingly, resorting to various tests only when unsure. This has been replaced by a total reliance on a test kit, where questions have been raised as regards reliability of methodology and quality of technicians. With diagnosis by algorithms and prescriptions by regulated standard protocols, physicians are rendered irrelevant. They have actually been denied any voice, on pain of loss of employment, de-registration, loss of grants, outright cancelled.

Secondly, an ideological shift has taken place in responding to the viral outbreak as a health security issue and not a medical incident. As a result, health measures taken have not been in accordance with medical pandemic response and contrary to standards of epidemiological and medical state of the art. On the other hand, a security focus encompasses full-blown control measures that trample on individual rights and freedoms.

Those with a logical and intelligent mind who never ask why, should do well to recall the words of Martin Luther King: "Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity."

This 2nd Day hearing provides explosive background on how the ideological shift has crept mendaciously onto the world. It touched on the historical geo-political background of powerful global elites working under a veil of secrecy, of regulatory, political, and government capture by these actors, and of the web of conflicts of interest of many key actors. These insights are provided by experts in military intelligence, investigative journalists and ex-WHO personnel.

For those not widely read, the details may seem boring and disconnected. For those who have heard some conspiracy theories here and there, may well connect some dots. For me personally, a lot of things revealed in this hearing are helping to answer a lot of questions in the subconscious. I have some skin in the game as regards the idea of globalist elites trying to control the world. Ever since some 35 years ago when I first came across Alex Jones' exposure of the Bohemian Grove (there were claims Liberal elites in US are pedophiles and Satan worshiping cultist groupies), I had been interested in secret societies such as Illuminati, Bildenburg Group, Round Table, Freemasons and think tanks such as Chatham House, Trilateral Commission, and Foreign Relations Council and their New World Order design. I read up as much as I could. Alex is the so-called greatest conspiracy theorist in the internet, but he has got more things right than wrong. His latest call made a few months ago about a major war breaking out in February this year was spot on when Russia declared war on Ukraine 22 Feb 2022. My 30 years in banking helped as I am acquainted with the City Of London anomaly mentioned by the first speaker (Video 8). The reference is to a small area of about 1 sq mile within Greater London. This is known as the City of London Corporation which is somewhat like the Vatican City, it functions as an entity unto itself. All the old wealth, the financial czars of old Europe, yes the Rothschilds, Astors, Hapsburgs etc, are based in this tiny enclave. From here, their tentacles spread throughout the world.

If the idea of some families trying to gain control of the world seems ridiculous to you, consider this. It wasn't too long ago when one single company, the British East India Company, ruled the whole sub-continent of India and various parts of SE Asia. Today, it is a cabal of corporate globalists which have captured UN agencies, governments and state and international institutions of interest via dubious NGOs, charities and revolving doors. The WHO is without doubt, an agency that has been captured. Today, the czar for matters relating to vaccines is Bill Gates. No one elected him there. Listen to Dr Astrid Stuckelberger (video 13), ex-WHO staffer who described how mechanisms have grown complex and difficult to understand, how non-governmental agencies get embeded into WHO and making decisions, how Bill Gates' role in WHO has a special non-impunity protection (he cannot be sued nor held liable for anything), how WHO's constitution supersedes state constitutions. There are only 3 states that have not signed over their sovereignty on health matters to WHO - Vatican City, Iran and US.

Creeping New World Order initiatives ensnare states to end up subjugating their sovereignty to dubious non-state actors. In this light, it becomes clear President Trump's inclination to disengage US from United Nation Agencies, such as WHO, UNCHR and the Paris Accord for environmental sustainability.

All those desirous to understand the Truth of this pandemic should invest time to go through these videos. The pandemic is just a matter of a medical infliction on the world, but the background story is about our personal sovereignty that a group of corporate globalists seek to control. Again, this seems far fetched for many. I encourage all skeptics to read up on Klaus Schwab's vision of Transhumanism. They are not even hiding their plans for the New World Order any more. Their designs are plain to the public, and yet non-believers are still the majority.

Day 2 Video 8 Alex Thomson (Signals Intelligence Agency, UK)
Alex describes the geopolitics of the West in the period 1870s to WW2. Private wealth centred in the City of London is the real power behind crowns and governments. In the words of Cecil Rhodes: "Why should we not form a secret society where we have but one object, the furtherance of the British Empire and the bringing of the whole uncivilised world under one British rule for the recovery of the United States and for the making of the whole Anglo-Saxon race under One Empire". The New World Order agenda is the imposition of British form of liberal democracy and world view on the whole world. Rhodes Scholarships, Global Leader Fellowship of the World Economic Forum, various think thanks, many NGOs, charities and philantrophic foundations, are clandestine institutions of the elites aimed at influencing and recruiting brilliant alumnus into their fold. This has morphed from an intrinsically Britishque idea to a global corporate elitist agenda. Prof Ngaire Woods, founder of Global Economic Governance Programme at Oxford University, famously said at the 2021 WEF meeting : "The good news is the elites across the world trust each other more and more, so we can come together and design and do beautiful things together."

Whereas in the past, war was the means of influencing events to bring people under control, in current times, pandemics are recognised as a way to control without a conflict.

The British recognised early that mind control of population is key. It is therefore essential to master what they termed "Mind Space". The Brits were early into psyops, a subset of which is national health, which was nationalised in 1948. This idea of Mind Space has developed into the current hot topic of transhumanism and genetic decoding of human genomes and the debate on the copyright and ownership of human beings. On the scariest end of the genetic vaccine programme is the proposition that novel technology is one step toward the dystopian objective of total control of the human 'livestock' so humanity can be branded and inventorised. This is no longer a mad scientist's dream but within the realms of technology today.

Video 8 - Alex Thomson (45 mins)

Day 2 Video 9A & 9B Matthew Ehret (Canadian Investigative Journalist, Author)
(Video size is too big for this blog platform. I compressed and split it into 2 parts).

I highly recommend you view video 9. Matthew displays an intellectualism on a subject that seems far beyond his youthful looks.

Matthew gives a great and brief insight into the geo-politics after WW2 to present day. The British Empire may have been long gone, but the coterie of the old wealth that thrived in the past has embeded myriad fifth columns in all the countries of the Commonwealth and the US. The hands of the City of London are in many countries in the form of roles played by distinguished Rhodes scholars who have been pivotal in pushing policies and initiatives that promote the new Anglo imperialism. Of course many such scholars went on to do good deeds for humanity. But those willing to sell their soul to work for the City are recruited.

Seen in this light, the current schisms in the US becomes very clear. On the one side are republicans, those who want an independent sovereign state. On the other are old British loyalists who signed up for the New World Order under Anglo-Saxon corporate elite control. The treasonous and destructive policies and acts of many American leaders in the Executive, Legislative, Judiciary, the Fourth Estate, academia, entertainment industry, Wall Street, private corporations and the Deep State (the civil service and all state agencies) make perfect sense.

"Fascism in the postwar inevitably will push for Anglo-Saxon imperialism and eventually for war with Russia. Already American fascist are talking and writing about this conflict and using it as an excuse for their internal hatred and intolerances toward certain races, creeds and classes". Incredibly, this is a quote of Vice President Henry Wallace in 1946. This basically reflects the zeitgeist of our times. Russia announced it attacked Ukraine 22 Feb 2022. We know who these fascists are. Vaccine tyranny is a manifestation of their designs. And no, they are not Donald Trump and conservatives.

The bottom line is, propaganda has normalised the view in the West that Russia or China is the existential threat. Generally unknown is the threat of the remnants of the British Empire that reports not to the Queen but an insidious group from the City of London, which have planted fifth columns, captured governing institutions (including WHO) and 'Mind Space' in many countries.

My only objection to Matthew's evidence is his representation of Justin Trudeau's swearing-in ceremony as Canadian PM pledging loyalty to the British monarch is some sort of eureka moment of conspiratorial proportion. I wouldn't look much into this. It is but a ceremonial peculiarity. Trudeau is the head of government and the Queen is the Canadian Head of State. The Queen represents the people, thus pledging loyalty to her is a pledge to Canadians. The Queen is the monarch to several states and head of state to many others such as Australia and New Zealand.

Video 9A - Matthew Ehret (37 mins)

 Video 9B - Matthew Ehret (34 mins)

Video 10 Brian Gerrish (Investigative journalist) & Debbie Evans (Nursing professional)

Brian and Debbie gave evidence for the scene in UK. Brian shared information from investigative work in public corruption, Debbie from her knowledge of the UK public health services.

Some interesting takeaways are :
1. UK government's pursuit of the 'Mind Space' has institutionalised the use of applied behavioural psychology in health management. Psychiatrists and psychologists are getting into policy making roles in the 2 agencies SAGE & SPI_B that handle the pandemic. The UK team advocated the use of instilling fear and coercion in pandemic management. Inclusion is a social policing approach, a divisive drive that promotes the community to force others to conform -- eg wear masks, get vaccinated, etc.
2.Regulatory capture of UK Natl Health Services by SAGE/SPI_B team resulted in a paradigm shift from medical approach to a 'mantra' approach in handling patients. Eg there is a Covid/Unvaccinated/Death-Pathway. If a patient has Covid but found to be unvaccinated, he is put on a protocol that leads to death. Health workers no longer discuss patient healthcare and are stressed with the state of cognitive dissonance. 
3.UK's formulated approach has been replicated in various countries, thus the same techniques are used everywhere.  
4. The Golden Triangle (Cambridge Uni-Oxford Uni-City of London) is UK's Silicon Valley for Life Sciences. A corrupted and insidious network of Big Pharma, Academia, City of London, Charities, NGO, and professional consultants have taken hold in the Golden Triangle via revolving doors, fundings, lobbies. An incestuous relationship full of conflicts of interest exist. Invariably, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation features prominently.
5. It is a familiar dysfunctional state of affairs in UK health services where non-state players have usurped the driver's seat.

Is it a wonder when Dr Robert Marlone first talked of  'mass disconsonance psychosis' being created in the pandemic, he caused a great uproar in the corridors of those pushing the vaccine narrative.

Video 10 - Brian Gerrish & Debbie Evans ( 65 mins)

Video 11 Whitney Webb (Investigative Journalist)

I cannot quite grasp what basically her contribution is to the evidence. She seems to be coming from diverse angles, and although interesting as detached info, I am unable to put out a meaningful summary. Nevertheless, I leave the clip here for anyone who wants to try to understand her.

Video 11 - Whitney Evans ( 28 mins)

Day 2 Video 12 James Bush (Engineer )

James has military background and years managing biolabs. Listening to James, one needs to be careful to separate facts from opinion. I think his evidence, in a real court of law, would have come under intense scrutiny and discarded, which the Grand Jury failed to do.

He introduced "Dark Winter" and "Operation Lockstep" and meant to link them to the agenda of the New World Order. For those not familiar :
"Dark Winter" - was the code-name given to an exercise conducted in 2001 by John Hopkins Center and the government to test US preparedness for a bio-terrorism attack. It used the scenario of a smallpox attack in 3 states. Various organisations were invited to a presentation of the exercise debrief at Andrews Air Base for their feedback. It being a bio-warfare exercise, of course lots of security and military personnel were involved. James Bush was an attendee.
"Operation Lockstep" - In 2010 The Rockefeller Foundation wrote a report "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development". This was in their website but has since been taken down. The report was about understanding the many ways in which technology will impact international development in the future. Included in the report was a section called "Lock Step" which dealt with the scenario of a pandemic in the future. This listed 3 steps (you can see in the video) which ran eerily similar to what actually happened in the Covid-19 pandemic.
There was no such operation. The fact that it had fingerprints of Rockefeller (a name closely linked to New World Order) triggered all sensors. The uncanny resemblance of the scenario in the report to the way Covid-19 pandemic actually panned out belatedly fed the conspiracy theory that went viral. How did Rockefeller et al knew in 2010 about Covid-19?

New World Order - my 2 cents worth:
James Bush briefly tried to link the Rockefeller name to the New World Order agenda by referencing to the eponymous book written by Ralph Epperson in 1990. The engineer did not expand on what the book was all about. For those who have not read the book, nor really understand what the New World Order is all about, let me summarise here so you get a gist of how all this ties up with the pandemic. (I am inclined to write a separate blog on this most interesting topic some time in the future).

There is a school of thought that historical events in the world never happen by chance. Instead, much of the important events have been orchestrated by unseen hands working in secrecy. Ralph Epperson conducted 27 years research to put the book together, based not on his own opinions, but on what the various actors themselves actually said and written. He culled the info from people such as 33 Degree masons like Albert Pike, Albert Mackey and Manly Hall, the founder of Illumati Adam Weishaupt, various US Presidents including George Washington, George Bush Snr, communists giants of the past Karl Marx, Lenin, etc. Very basically, the various secretive organisations seem to have congruent objective of demolishing the way we live and transforming the world into an entirely different order.

The core objectives they seek are - a Godless world where men live by Reasons only, the people owns nothing, abolishment of family structure (children to be raised by state), curtailment of rights of association, free public education (means controlled), there will be no nations, existing governments must go. All these are to be found in the literatures of Freemasons, Illumati, Soviet apparatchiks, Maoists, Communist International, World Economic Forum, Humanists and New Age organisations.

It is evident in the Judeo Western world, the actions needed to achieve these objectives have been in motion for decades if not centuries. There are attacks on Judaisn and Christianity, on our inalienable rights as individuals, on education, on national borders and the idea of patriotism and loyalty, those who disagree to be extinguished. The means to achieve the ends is by fear, chaos, control and eugenics. Covid-19 pandemic management looks like following some preconceived playbook. In the US, all these seem to culminate in the one year under the liberal Biden era. Against this backdrop, it is easy to see why the liberal left in the US and the whole western world are vemently against Donald Trump and conspired to engineer his downfall and doing everything they can to prevent his return to power.

It seems to me there is a triumvirate of protagonists. On the one hand, there is the material world of mad scientists and financial and corporate globalists out for economic capture of the world. Then there are the ultra Socialists Liberals and mad naturalist philosopher types who think by the power of man's capability to Reason alone, there is no God. By Reason alone is morality established. Man can be Gods. Finally, the occultist, esoteric group such as Freemasons who believe in moving into the Light, the attainment of real knowledge as provided in the realm of the Morning Light, ie Lucifer. There is shared objectives. In all likelihood, each group is the tiger on which the other rides. In his Farewell Speech in 1789, George Washington said : "Of all the dispositions and habits which leads to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. Let it simply be asked where is the security for prosperity, for reputation, for life if the sense of religious obligation desert? And let us indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion." It was an ancient and dire warning against moving away from God. It is the reason why many see a spiritual struggle in the world today between Light and Darkness.

Video 12 - James Bush ( 42 mins)

Day 2 Video 13A & 13B Dr Sylvia Behrendt (lawyer)/ Dr Astrid Buckelberger
(Video size is too big for this blog platform. I compressed and split it into 2 parts).

I strongly recommend these 2 videos for an excellent insider info on the nefarious things going on in WHO, and not just because Sylvia is delightful to watch. Both these ladies are ex-WHO staffers who objected to nefarious developments in this UN agency and have decided to speak up bravely.

Dr Sylvia Behrendt is a legal expert in the field of pandemic management and one time legal consultant to the Secretariat of the International Health Regulations (IHR) of WHO. She lays down the background info on WHO from the regulatory perspective, which shows the organisation moving away from a medical to a health security focus.

In the 1990s the US focused concerns on the rise of bio-terrorism with particular worries on emerging infectious diseases. The 'Dark Winter' exercise used the scenario of new strains of smallpox. From lessons learnt in the exercise, came legislation. Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (HSA) was passed supposedly to address bio-terrorism issues, but was heavily criticised as an assault on the constitutional rights of Americans. It gave dictatorial powers to governors and obliterated health privacy standards. (By the way, the HSA was authored by Prof Lawrence Gostin of Geogetown University, who also sits on the WHO board.)

The US view of treating health as a security issue is to institutionalise state exception to handle medical events. It means the medical is replaced by the political. This approach soon got replicated in WHO which formed a new Emerging Infectious Diseases Div (which bypass an existing Communicable Disease and Control Dept). WHO in turn reformed the IHR. The IHR was just a sanitary law (ie deals with the cross-border movement of animals with disease implications). Previously IHR was a mundane affair dealing with only 2 or 3 diseases. This has now been re-constituted along the dictatorial lines as in the HSA laws of the US to deal with any outbreak of diseases that pose a global threat. These regulations override all member state legislation.

My 2 cents worth :
What has happened is the US, which has not ratified the WHO (they are not bound by WHO directives) has influenced WHO to reform its constitution which all other countries in the world must follow. Thus similar draconian steps in pandemic management are deployed all over the world. The Biological Warfare Convention which banned bio-warfare, came into force in 1975. There are only 10 countries which have not ratified it (Israel is one of them). US has ratified this treaty. Under this Convention, dual purpose biological research (civilian and military use) is illegal. In the 1990s bio-terrorism preparedness became vogue in the US. At the same time when the US was working on bio-terrorism preparedness, DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency) started funding projects into emerging infectious diseases, including 'gains of function' research. WEF, Bill Gates and many other actors, started moving into this sphere and gained positions of influence. The question is, is there unseen hands driving an agenda? Is there a conspiracy?

Dr Astrid Buckelberger is a scientist, researcher, trainer, author who has served as consultant to various UN agencies including WHO. She presents insights from the operations side. Listen to her explain the web of conflicts of interest, or regulatory capture by non-science actors. Her delectable expose includes the Vaccine Alliance which is a public-private partnership called GAVI created to facilitate Bill Gates' role, and which has a non-punitive constitution which protects him from being sued; Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the Director-General of WHO is basically an appointee of Bill Gates; the use of consultancy firm McKinsey which is Bill Gates goto firm for such matters; Dr Christian Dorsten (the German equivalent of Dr Fauci) has an interest in the German manufacturer of PCR kit., etc.

My two cents worth:
The WHO is not what it seems to the public - a pre-eminent UN agency on all things health that all countries must look to for advice and leadership. For years, it has been bogged down by administrative and organisational problems due mainly to funding issues. Each new Director-General comes in with promises of reform. Staff have 'reform-fatigue' and wary of management consultants and their "musical chairs", "cost-cutting" and "debunked management fads".

In stepped Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It became the 2nd biggest donor to WHO after the US government. Let's not kid ourselves. There is no free lunch. It is 'philantrocapitalism' at work. For the billions he dispenses, Bill Gates gets back billions in tax credits. He is now the vaccine czar at WHO and gets to demand intellectual rights to vaccine patents, which guarantees pharma monopoly. What is happening is the socialising of vaccine development funding and cost, but private profiteering by pharma companies in which Bill Gates has substantial interests.

WHO has worked with many management consultants. Many health workers in WHO find them pervasive and ubiquitous. Much financial resources have been spent on consultancy work which have not been transparent. Bill Gates brought in McKinsey which boasted involvement with Mers in Saudi Arabia to Zika in Brazil, 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic in West Africa. Madhu Pai of McGill University wrote of an African colleague who has had to face ‘kids with little or no experience coming all the time to advise her government on what to do about health.

Bill Gates has an outsized role in WHO and together with other consultants and NGOs, non-science and non-state actors are now shaping public health policies. These actors are non-accountable, whose work are non-transparent, and often involve what Pai calls “global health consulting malpractice.” The consequence is great damage to the health institution, made worse by a new culture that has blanketed the world where global health workers and analysts will not speak up for fear of compromising their professional prospects.

Video 13A - Sylvia Behrendt & Dr Astrid Buckelberger ( 37 mins)

Video 13B - Sylvia Behrendt & Dr Astrid Buckelberger ( 37 mins)

 

Collection :

The Greatest "Grand Jury" In Human History (Day 1)
The Greatest "Grand Jury" In Human History (Day 2)