US - 13-year-old dies in sleep after getting COVID-19 vaccine; CDC investigating
Germany - 12-Year Old Child Dies 2 Days After Receiving The Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine
Thailand - Teen dies from blood clots after second jab
On 10 May 2021 FDA approved the use of the emergency vaccines for children ages 12 to 15. In super quick time 18 May, like a sheep, MOH followed suit (See Chanel News Asia). Singapore HSA analysed the data in super efficient 7 days and considered the test vaccines safe for children. Somehow the extremely low infection rate of this age group justifies the various risks of vaccine adverse reactions already well documented. I mentioned in previous blogs that Pfizer's website for Comirnaty did not recommend its use for children in this age group. Pfizer was saying use their no-liability Pfizer-BioNtech Covid19 vaccine label for the kids but not the Comirnaty label. Why that anomaly never bothered MOH at all is a wonder. Pfizer has since revamped the website.
23 June 2021 MOH announced it was going to receive the first batch of FDA approved vaccine Comirnaty. (See Straits Times.) On 23 Aug 2021 FDA approved Comirnaty. The first thing I want to ask MOH is how on Earth did they arrange for the first batch of Comirnaty in May when the FDA approved it 3 months later? Does MOH have some crystal ball or is there some international collusion going on?
I have explained in previous blogs that Comirnaty is a scam, a US political ploy to fool the masses to vaccinate. There is no Comirnaty in the market. Pfizer are'nt so stupid to market Comirnaty where they have liabilities when they can sell the same formulation under the label Pfizer-BioNtech Covid 19 vaccine which carries no liabilities as it's sold under emergency use. MOH cannot show us the Comirnaty that they supposedly received. Why does the Singapore government collaborate in the US trickery?
Since Comirnaty has been approved, can the MOH explain why are they still using other untested vaccines under emergency use? If an approved drug for a disease is available, why use other untested options?
In the US there is a court case going on currently. More than 350,000 US Army personnel are suing the Secretary of Defence for the unconstitutional vaccine mandate. In the course of the proceedings, it was revealed soldiers were jabbed with Pfizer-BioBtech Covid-19 vaccine, but recorded as Comirnaty-vaccinated. MOH has overcome this problem by a sleigh of hand. It simply uses one definition Pfizer-BioNtech Covid-19/Comirnaty. To MOH it does'nt matter which one you take because they are the same formulation. True, but the legal status is different. If you take Comirnaty, you may want to sue Pfizer if you sustain any injury. The truth of the matter is, there is no Comirnaty, and MOH knows it. Why all this trickery in both US and Singapore?
When they come for your 5 year olds, for goodness sake, make your decision with full knowledge which MOH does not offer.
In October 2021, the FDA approved the use of vaccines for children in age group 5-11. Good Lord, despite the fact infection rate is even lower in this group, will MOH kowtow and follow the US? Precedence says YES. There is no more independent thinking.
Pfizer prepared a document for the FDA Advisory Committee Meeting on 26 Oct 2021 to approve the Pfizer vaccine for children aged 5-11. It is a 39 page report (Read (FDA website here) In this document, Pfizer slipped in the following by stealth:
" To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine buffer instead of the phosphate buffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.">
As blood clot is a high risk side effect for younger people, Pfizer has added a new ingredient called tromethamine. This is a drug to prevent cardiac arrests. It is a sort of blood thinner. If you send your children to take a vaccine against a virus for which their natural immunity is very well capable of handling, and have to inject something to prevent cardiac arrest, a condition which they do not have, does that not sound incredulously silly and dim witted?
So when they come for your five-year olds, consider that adverse effects of tromethamine may include respiratory depression, local irritation, tissue inflammation, injection site infection, febrile response, chemical phlebitis, venospasm, hypervolemia, IV thrombosis, extravasation (with possible necrosis and sloughing of tissues), transient decreases in blood glucose concentrations, hypoglycemia, and hepatocellular necrosis with infusion via low-lying umbilical venous catheters -- take your pick. On top of this, don't discount all the other known adverse effects of mRNA vaccines.
You might want to ask MOH if they are aware of the use of tromethamine and do they object? You might also ask MOH how are they going to administer the vaccine? Tromethamine on its own is intravenously administered. The mRNA vaccine is injected into the deltoid muscles. What are the consequences of injecting into the muscles a drug which is supposed to be given intravenously? MOH? Anyone?
Do your own research. You owe that to your children.
Related blogs: