Pages

▼

Sunday, October 31, 2021

Pandemic Blunders And Blinders As Singapore Suffers A Surge In Infection


For almost 12 months from Aug 2020 to Aug 2021, Singapore was doing great. Then suddenly all hell broke loose and we are now under severe restrictions. What the heck happened? The Delta variant broke out in India around May/June 2021. Despite public concerns, Singapore immigration kept VTL open for incoming travelers from India and elsewhere. At about the same time, the government created the perfect storm by being the first country to treat the pandemic as an endemic and opened up the country. A most catastrophic policy error, the price for which is the new target of 5,000 daily cases.

Now reports have surfaced of a workers' dormitory where 50% of the residents are un-vaccinated. This seems to suggest returning workers from India were allowed entry without vaccination papers. Government dumps aid packages on dormitory operators but elite business owners do nothing to ensure their workers are protected.  One wonders what the status is like in the rest of the worker dormitories.

Taking the cue from US, the blame game is on. The un-vaxx are responsible. Data is biased and explanations are skewed to fit a narrative. For example, only 6% of those eligible to vaccinate remain un-vaxx, yet 60% of those in ICU are un-vaxx.

The reality is the majority are those unvaxx are elderlies and/or with comorbidities. Let's assume 3% are healthy, split between the young and elderlies. Let's say 1.5% are the healthy unvax. It's fair to assume that 4.5% would be more house-bound. The government want us to believe the 1.5% is responsible for the rise in cases, with no data to show who the vaxx'd caught the virus from. The vaxx'd are still catching and spreading the virus, but the success of the vaccination is now parlayed in the evidence that the majority of those in ICU are the unvaxx. It is however, never explained that the majority of the unvaxx in ICU are those with comorbidities or elderlies.

The un-vaxx have been barred from malls and restaurants and food outlets. Facebook commenter, Goh Meng Seng, rightly pointed out 3 weeks have now passed with the segregation regulations. The infection rate should have decreased, but it has'nt.

Very unfortunately, we have come to a stage where trust is dwindling. Whilst the government thrusts their data at our faces to justify the segregation policies, and now impose a prima facie mandatory vaccination by requesting employers to terminate the unvaxx if it impedes the efficiency of their operation. In his FB couple of days ago, opposition member Jamus Lim said "I'm glad that the government has taken steps to ensure that there is'nt inadvertent discrimination of individuals that are unable to choose...." I'm afraid the young man is wrong. Vaccine tyranny is already here.

The case for Ivermectin:

Data is extremely useful, sparsing the numbers is tricky and it is easy to be biased to suit a narrative. But here's some data that is so simple to understand, yet WHO and all governments, including Singapore, simply refuse to acknowledge.

India was hit hard by the Delta variant. When it made a decision in Apr 2021 to use Ivermectin, I followed developments there. By July, India was out of the woods.
India is a federation and states pursue health policies independently. The 2 states of Uttar Pradesh and Delhi that pushed Ivermectin are now at almost zero cases. WHO participated in the Uttar Pradesh programme so they are in full possession of the evidence of the  success of Ivermectin.  
The Indian state of Kerala makes for interesting comparison. It also went for Ivermectin, but stopped on Aug 5. Cases began to rise again. It is unable to achieve the same success as Uttar Pradesh and Delhi.

Indonesia was hit hard and health services almost collapsed in Jun 2021. When it decided to use Ivermectin, I followed their development. Early this month, their cases are down to negligible. State-owned pharmaceutical firm PT Indofarma is now producing Ivermectin in Indonesia.

Japan was hit hard in Jul 2021. Japan was convinced of the African Ivermectin enigma.  From 1995-2010 several states took part in the African Program for Onchocerciasis Control (APOC) in which Ivermectin was used against parasitic diseases. 20+ African states took part. All these APOC states are showing very low rate of covid infection. By using Ivermectin, these countries had inadvertently created pre-conditions for immunity from covid-19.

When Japan announced they will use Ivermectin, I followed their development. By early this month, Japan had licked the problem.

One is unlikely to read of anything good about Ivermectin. There have been 52 peer-reviewed studies which showed Ivermectin works against covid-19. But a Google search will show nothing positive. Covid news are tightly suppressed to support only one side of the narrative - Vaccines are good, they work, be a good fella and go get the jab, for everybody's sake. What does the mainstream media think of the experiences of India, Indonesia and Japan?
Their Experts say herd immunity or pre-existing protection from the virus are among several reasons for sudden drop in cases. They say herd immunity when India has such a low rate of vaccination. They say 'pre-existing' protection but had no idea what they are talking. Yet 'pre-existing' protection is what they have in some African states, but no one is talking about this. The vaxx'd are puzzled, the unvax knows the game changer for Uttar Pradesh and Delhi was Ivermectin.
See how Singapore media described the Indonesian initiative on 15 Jul 2021. It reported the government "... began distributing free medicine and vitamins to self-isolating Covid-19 patients in high-risk areas .......... Each package will have seven days worth of therapeutic Covid-19 drugs and vitamins, and will be given to asymptomatic patients as well as those with mild to moderate symptoms including fever and dry cough."

Straits Times never once mentioned Ivermectin in the cocktail of drugs being used by Indonesia.  It's the jumbo elephant in the room our servile press is forbidden to comment on. There has been no follow up report in Straits Times or other mainstream media, on the success of the Indonesian initiative.
Again media and their experts are puzzled. Reuters reported " ... the speed with which a wave of infections and hospitalisations fuelled by the infectious Delta variant has ebbed away has confounded the experts." But Japanese authorities knew their decision to switch to Ivermectin saved the day.

What does Singapore Government think of Ivermectin?

In it's fact-check article 24 Oct 2021, the government said "It is not an anti-viral medicine and is not approved by HSA for preventing or treating COVID-19. To date, there is no conclusive scientific evidence from rigorously conducted large-scale randomised controlled trials to prove that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19." This is the dead-pan statement that all governments in the world seem to play like an orchestra.

But our government is wrong. Read this before it is taken down.
"Large-scale study shows oral hydroxychloroquine and povidone-iodine throat spray can reduce spread of covid-19 in high transmission settings" ..... Institute Journal Of Infectious Disease
And this study was done by none other than our very own NUH ! In April 2020, National University of Health conducted a large-scale randomised controlled trial among healthy migrant workers in Singapore to see if a preventive regimen can be effective in reducing COVID-19 transmission. The study was published in the Institute Journal of Infectious Disease. Hydroxychloroquine, Povidone-Iodine, Vit C, Zinc and Ivermectin were tested. The study suggested hydroxychloroquine has efficacy in treating covid19, in contrast with various prior studies. It also suggested Povidone-Iodine has efficacy as topical therapy in nasal spray. It also confirmed Vit C, zinc and Ivermectin has some similar low level of efficacy.

It should be noted that in the NUH study, Ivermectin was applied in only one single dose. Compared various doctors who reported efficacy rates of 70%-80% for Ivermectin, the drug was very effective when used in several doses (Uttar Pradsh used a 5-day course), in combination with other drugs such as N-pak,  Vit C, zinc, glutathione, Z-pak, prednisone, monoclonal antibodies etc and given in the early stage. NUH recognised this when they concluded "It remains uncertain whether a larger sample size in the zinc/vitamin C combination arm could alter this conclusion and whether the results would differ had higher and repeated doses of Ivermectin been studied."

The high vaccination-high cases enigma:

With no gut feel to change strategies, it seems the gameplan is to double down on 100% vaccination, which is unattainable. With about 83% vaccinated, Singapore is already in the top 3 countries in the world. The pursuit of marginal gains in the vaxx numbers is unlikely to bring new cases down due to (1) it is already proven vaxx'd are themselves carriers and spreaders and (2) countries with high vaccination rates are seeing high new cases.

I appreciate the authorities came down hard on the website 'Truth Warriors" for saying high vaxx rate = high cases as misinformation. However my 'Covid-safe country index update 27 Oct" seems to indicate the co-relationship exists. I concede co-relationship does not necessary equate causation, but the evidence is in the charts. Going into September with a high vaccination rate, I was fearful Singapore will be a replay of Israel, which was exactly what happened.

The experience of Israel and Singapore is also now playing out in Ireland. It is somewhat similar to Singapore with population of 5m, fully vaccinated is 75% and for adults it is 92% (Singapore is 5.7m, 83%, 94%). Since July, the new cases in Ireland have risen dramatically. It is reaching 3,000 cases per day now. No where is this more dramatic than in the city of Waterford which has a vaccination rate of 99.7% for adults and yet it is the city with the highest daily new cases.

The case for early treatment and prophylactic protocol :

Proof that early treatment with some prophylactic therapies works well is also fully supported by the experience of the state of Florida in US. The Republican run state is not anti-vax. It practices personal choice and provides free vaccination to those who want it. In the middle of the year, the state experienced a surge in cases, which they suspected was due to the influx of illegal immigrants from the south. Florida's numbers soared and Democrats gloated. The Governor opened special centres to provide prophylactic therapies that included the monoclonal antibody Regeneron. As their numbers came under control again, the Biden administration denied the state access to the large quantity of Regeneron. It is a political move to dampen the success of any initiative that is not pro-vaccine. Federal government would prefer to let Floridans die. Regeneron is under a Federal acquisition contract so Florida cannot buy directly. In reaction to this denial of supply, the state switched brand and purchased Sotrovimab from GlaxoSmithKline. Today, Florida has the lowest new cases in the whole of US, despite it having no lockdowns and low vaccination rates.

What are our neighbours doing? Indonesia took a bold calculated move to use Ivermectin and solved their problem. Malaysia has taken a deep dive to study Ivermectin before making a decision. In Philippines, Doctor Allan Landrito purchased the compounds and produced his own Ivermectin which he said he has sold to and treated thousands. He has since stopped distribution as authorities cautioned breach of laws (and rightfully so). President Duterte has recently signed an order that allowed physicians to treat their patients they deem best, including the use of Ivermectin. And Duterte is right. The manner of medical treatment is the sole prerogative of the attending physician who understands what's best for his patient. It used to be this way until the pandemic came along and all doctors are bound by a prescription-fits-all recommended by regulators who know nothing about the patients.

In my earlier blog "Open Letter To MTF To Adopt The Uttar Pradesh Model To Stop Pandemic"  I suggested adoption of the Uttar Pradesh model of an outreach programme to treat all asymtomatic cases at the early stage using a prophylactic protocol that includes Ivermectin and other drugs. A proactive rather than a reactive programme, is the best way to arrest the infection.

I am not unforgiving of errors. A pandemic is a very difficult situation where policy decisions try to balance social restrictions and economic activities. Achievements come out of trials and errors. However, we seem to have been inflicted with the same blows twice over. When the virus arrived, Singapore was late in closing down borders, and we had the dormitories as super spreaders, all these in 2020. Now with the Delta variant thriving, we are opening borders, and here we are again, with dormitory breakouts in 2021.

Given the evidence, the crux of the matter currently is not a matter of percentage of vaxx'd or unvaxx. But Singapore seems hellbent on pursuing 100% vaccination as the solution. We all know what Einstien said about doing the same things over and over again.


Related blogs :


at 3 comments:

Saturday, October 30, 2021

Covid-Safe Country Index (Update 27 Oct 2021)

Basis: The conditional probability of the chance of contracting Covid-19 and dying from the infection. (Percentage of cases to population X percentage of death to number of cases).

Observations of 27 Oct since the last index dated 5 Sep:

1. Singapore dropped like a bomb by 100% from from 24th safest position to 50th. This is not a surprise as hospital beds are taken up and countries restricted movements to and from our shores.

2. The 3 countries that have taken to Ivermectin recently and which I tracked, have improved their rankings. These are Indonesia from 119 to 110, India from 105 to 95 and Japan from 80-70.

3. The African APOC states are the countries in Africa that took part in the African Programem for Onchocerciasis Control (1995 to 2010) in which Ivermectin was used against parasitic diseases. These states all appear in upper 1/3rd of the index. Several other African states, although not in the programme, also appear to do well in the index, possibly due to the same fact Ivermectin is widely used. (APOC countries in the index are those in yellow-coloured cells). Also worth noting African states mostly use Sinovac or Sinopharm, by way of Chinese aid.

4. There have also been similar programmes of using Ivermectin against parasitic diseases in some countries in Latin America. However, the experience in these countries have not been the same as the APOC countries with regards to covid status. Latin American countries are not faring well. I can't sight any studies as to the reasons why. It would be interesting to know the causation.

5. Tanzania has dropped as the number one safest country (ignoring the island states) to 22nd. It could well be they are getting their reporting more up to date. Burundi is now the safest and China is still number two.

6. Ignore the changes in status of the small island states. Due to the small population, a slight change in numbers can appear significant.

7. The caveat to the report is the integrity of data is questionable. Some countries fudge the data discreetly in order to drive the vaccination narrative. For example, covid events are reported under respective comorbidities, or less tests means less cases reported.

8. Of the countries (ignoring the small island states) which have achieved more than 60% fully vaccinated, 18 of them lie in the bottom 1/3rd of the table. and 10 are in the top 1/3rd. This seems to support the observation that the higher the vaccination rate, the higher the cases.

9. Check out the report and judge for yourself whether the observation that countries with low vaccination has lower probabilities of dying from covid bears some credence. Note that many African states have poor data reporting, but their vaccination progress is lagging far behind the rest of the world.

Click here to view PDF file (it's easier to see)

I have managed to embed the spreadsheet file here. But I'm still unable to make the external file responsive to fit the iframe. So unfortunately, the horizontal scroll is needed.



Related blogs :


at No comments:

Sunday, October 24, 2021

The Horror Behind Vaccines That You Probably Don't Know

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they've tried everything else." ... Winston Churchill

Now that vaccines don't seem to be working, what should we do? Let's tweak the data. How about spin the vaccinated has less serious effects. How about 2 shots good, 3 shots better. How about it's all the fault of the unvaccinated - the dirty carriers of the virus.

We seem to ape the socialist Americans who excel in creating fault lines in society. Vaccinated vs the unvaccinated, where in the US it is progressing into a real life Hunter Games mode. Here in Singapore, segregation is in effect.

Often we see the clarity of hearts between the vaxx'd and the un-vaxx, especially in the US. When an un-vaxx goes down with covid, or dies from it, especially the rich and famous, the vaxx'd floods media, facebook, twitter with schadenfreude. On the other hand, when a vaxx'd goes down, the narrative of the un-vaxx is usually trying to highlight the failure of the vaccines, not gloating about someone's misfortune. The un-vaxx respects the rights of folks to vaccinate and hopes in their heart of hearts that vaccination really works for those who took the jabs. On the other hand, the vaxx'd views the un-vaxx as dirty carriers of the virus, flat Earthers, non-science bigots, irresponsible, and murderers, according to Joe Biden.

We are just waiting for when vaccination for covid will be mandated. Will Singapore follow Australia, US and Canada to lead the universal charge of vaccine tyranny. Many countries allow for vaccination exemption on religious grounds. Singapore has no such protection, despite the plurality of religions here. However, there is actually nothing in religions that forbid vaccination. The clergies in fact tend, to support vaccination programs.

For Muslims, the issue is simply whether it is halal. The litmus test is whether there is anything swine in the vaccines. Of course there is'nt any. The swine concern I suspect will be more serious in the future, when specially cloned pigs without the genes that cause organ rejection will be farmed and organs harvested for transplant. That technology has already arrived. However, vaccines do involve use of other animal cell tissues, such as kidneys of monkeys, as well as fetal cells. In this regards, I expect Muslim concerns, on the issue of halal, would relate to the compassionate process of killing the donor. I have not been able to sight any literature about this.

I am not aware of other religious objections. Vaccine objections for covid seem to be from minority ultra-orthodox Jews and white evangelicals. However, there is nothing to suggest this objection arises out of figurative readings of religious text. There is nothing in the holy books that has any relevance. The vaxx'd of course, volunteers a reason. They say the dogmatic idiots of faith believe the jab is the sign of the beast in the end times, thus will avoid at all cost. To these liberals, the religious folks are non-science bigots who believe in a flat Earth. There has been no big scale surveys to attempt to understand the reason for the objection. In 2019 a limited scale survey was done in Israel to find out why orthordox Jewish mothers object to have their children vaccinated for covid. It turned out there was nothing religious about it. They all decided not to vaccinate their children based on their assessment of risk.

As to the evangelicals, from what I have read in social media, it is all about some moral values they stand on. Fetal cells are used, either during vaccine studies, or in its production, or both. Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Johnson & Johnson, all use fetal cells. I believe only Astrazeneca mentions this. The other 3 kept this as part of their trade secret, but the truth have been leaked. The Left twists this objection to the Rights' anti-abortion stand, but it has nothing to do with this. The objection is simply because these folks reel in horror at the way the fetal cells are used. For those who are unaware, let me explain.


Parasite found in Pfizer vaccine

The reason for fetal cells is the need for a very clean environment to culture virus. The body tissues of grownups are contaminated so babies are used. You are probably thinking the fetal cells come from aborted babies, or those that died in child birth. So why the moral fuss of the evangelicals. The foetus can be obtained in 2 ways - by vagina delivery or cesarean. Natural delivery is problematic because the foetus will be contaminated by thousands of bacterium in the mother's vaginal fluid. In a cesarean delivery, the foetus does not come into contact with the mother's vaginal fluid. Unfortunately, it comes into contact with many hospital germs. To prevent contamination, the foetus is extracted with its water sac intact, which means the baby is still alive. This guarantees bacteriological sterility. The cell tissues are then extracted in clean laboratory facility. Another reason why the babies had to be alive is because for tissues to be viable and useful, there has to be functional blood supply in the body at the time of dissection.

And here comes the horror. The babies are cut open and their organs extracted. All this done with the babies alive. No anesthetic is allowed to avoid contamination. So the next time the vaxx'd wants to criticise the un-vaxx, I hope they can visualise the defenseless babies on the laboratory tables, kicking and twisting in unimaginable agony, and hear their screams as the scientists ripped out their kidneys, hearts, eyes ,,,,. And perhaps then they can have a little more respect for the sensibilities and moral values of the evangelical anti-vaxxers.

Vaccine tests are done mostly on the fetal cells extracted in the 1960s. The covid vaccines all use the same cell line called HEK 293. This came from a 1973 abortion in the Netherlands.

We can all be proudly science-based and rationalise the cruelty done to an unborn to obtain cell material for fundamental research and for the diagnosis of some human diseases, is for a greater good. So long as it's not our own body that is being dissected.




Related blogs:



at 4 comments:

Monday, October 18, 2021

Amidst Electricity Market Turmoil, Retailers Exit To Cut Cash Losses But Sit On A Pile of Futures Profits

Biden's catastrophic energy policy turned US from a net exporter to importer of oil and caused oil prices to increase steadily since he entered the White House. Recently, he had to beg OPEC to increase production. With OPEC's refusal to oblige when they met this Monday 15 October, oil prices responded immediately by shooting up to US$82/b Friday 17 October, its highest since Sep 2014. This is a steep over-run of the US$74/b average for Q4 the EIA (US Energy Information Admin) had previously forecasted.

This oil price hike is causing turmoil in our retail electricity market. Several retailers have either exited or going to exit the market. I shall try to explain here briefly how the tariff is derived, how gencos offer their auction prices, why the retail model is not sustainable, why retailers throw in the towel in this oil price hike crisis, and why retailers are not exactly loosing their pants.

Before I proceed, I like to get 2 constant gripes by the public out of the way:
(1). The government always use increase in oil prices as an excuse to raise tariff but our power generation is 90% from gas plants. The reason is, gas is priced differently depending on which region in the world. In our part of the world, gas is indexed to oil price. Hence oil price increase means gas price increase.
(2). Singapore Power squeezes the public with higher tariff but makes S$1 billion profit annually. Actually, SP purchases at the same wholesale price as all retailers. It makes zero profit from sales of electricity because all their sales to non-contestable consumers are fully hedged. The billion profits is from operations in transmission/distribution and overseas' subsidiaries. More importantly, Singapore electricity is not a cost-based regulated regime, it is market-driven prices. Consumers have freedom of choice to buy from any provider.

There are 3 basic terms that need to be understood first.

How SP price the tariff :

Tariff comprises of energy cost and a fixed cost (transmission cost, other admin cost). We concern ourselves only with the energy cost here. SP makes a forecast of the energy cost on a quarterly basis. This is computed as a new power generation company coming into the market. This cost of production comprises of a variable cost (mostly fuel) and fixed cost (capital charge or plant depreciation). This is computed for a certain desired load (output quantity). The production cost that is obtained this way is known as the LRMC (long run marginal cost). Marginal cost is the cost required to produce one more unit of the goods (kwh of electricity). To this LRMC is added a reasonable operating cost (admin, sales, etc) and ROI to arrive at the energy cost for the tariff.

How gencos (power generation companies) price their electricity:

Gencos look at production cost only at the variable composition. Fixed cost is ignored as they are a sunk cost. This is the SRMC (short run marginal cost). In the short run, Gencos can continue to keep the plant running as long as the price is not below the SRMC. Of course in the long run, this is not sustainable. Gencos price themselves using the SRMC plus a markup to cover fixed cost of production, operating cost, and ROI. How much to markup depends on the competition.

USEP (Uniform Singapore Energy Price):

Gencos sell their electricity to the WEM (Wholesale Electricity Market) via auction every 30 minutes. The average price of all the successful bid for each 30 min is the USEP (Uniform Singapore Electricity Price). There are some zonal fees to be paid to gencos depending on where their load enters the grid. All participants (retailers, SP, big corporations that buy direct) buy at the WEM at the same WEP (wholesale energy price), which is the USEP + a small admin fee.

A fourth term is vesting contracts. This is rather more complicated, so in the interest of keeping things simple here, I have omitted this.

Fig.1. Where power generation capacity is equal to demand, the SRMC would be close to LRMC. That is, Gencos' offered price will be close to the energy cost of the tariff. The USEP is not a straight line due to oil price volatility in every 30 minute auction..

Fig.2. When there is over capacity of power generation, the SRMC falls below the LRMC. With over capacity, gencos compete at lower prices in order to win despatch for their plants.

This means gencos are selling to the wholesale market at prices below the tariff energy cost. It means gencos are selling with razor thin ROI or making losses.

All retailers purchase electricity at the same wholesale price (USEP + a small admin charge). The yellow band represents the space that retailers can offer discounts to tariff. In earlier years, this was as high as 30% discounts.  This explains the reason why retailers can sell below tariff.

Singapore has a huge over-capacity in the market. As a result, gencos have been struggling with losses. In the long term, a status of SRMC curve below the LRMC is not sustainable for the market. The power generation industry survives on the belief the economy will grow the demand soon and absorb the over-capacity. For years, consumers have actually benefited on suppressed prices without understanding or appreciation.

Fig.3. When power generation is under-capacity, that is, when demand exceeds supply, the USEP will be higher than the tariff energy cost.

With under-capacity, gencos have the market power to offer higher prices at the wholesale market auction. This is the downside of a market-driven model vs a regulated price model. 

Under this scenario, the retail pricing model becomes unsustainable as retailers will be pricing themselves higher than tariff.

On Monday 15 October when OPEC decided not to increase production, all hell broke loose in the energy markets.

We are now in the situation as depicted in Fig.3. where the USEP is way above the LRMC. At this state, the retail pricing model collapses. The current situation is not caused by demand outstripping supply, but by the steep rise of fuel that pushed the SRMC up.

In such a situation, retail prices are way above tariff. Ordinarily, retailers would not be able to acquire new accounts. As the price is too volatile, many retailers have stopped quoting. Retail arms of Gencos, I suspect, will take on accounts only to the extent of their generation capacity.

Retailers sing 'Don't Cry For Me Argentina' :

A retailer who has taken the high risk of not hedging his position in the electricity futures market would be terribly crushed by now. But I suspect this is not the case. Practically all of them hedged. The market is simply too volatile not to hedge. However, even if they are hedged, the cashflow pressure weighs extremely heavy on they. Retailers purchase at the wholesale spot market and pay upfront but collect from their customers one week after a month end. With spot prices doubling since Monday, their immediate cash outflow has doubled. They are forced to exit the market due to liquidity crunch, not profitability if they are adequately hedged.

Retailers are always short on the cash side because they had contracted to sell to their customers electricity which they do not have. And now, as wholesale spot prices hiked, their cost have soared whilst revenue remain unchanged. Thus retailers are making severe cash losses at the moment.

On the other hand, retailers who hedged are long in the futures side. Since these futures contracts were purchased earlier, and with spot prices doubling, retailers are 'in the money'. They are making tremendous profits in the futures side now, but it's all on paper. 

So if retailers exit the market now and transfer accounts to SP as the lender of last resort, they cut the cash losses but still hold on to tremendous profits in the futures contracts. Let SP carry the baby, and sit on a pile of paper profits on the future contracts. What actual profits the futures contract will bring depends on the strike price at maturity dates. However, carrying a long futures position and riding into an oil price scenario of US$82/b average in the short term, it's a damn good place to be in. So it's a case of don't cry for me Argentina.

SP as supplier of last resort:

Retailers that exit transfer all accounts back to SP at prevailing tariff rates. SP steps in as supplier of last resort.This was what happened the previous occasion when Red Dot exit the market. But this time, SP has to shoulder 2 considerable burdens. (1) The volume is huge as there are several retailers heading for the door at the same time. (2) Prevailing tariff energy cost and wholesale spot price gap is way too big. USEP is now almost double the tariff. For SP to take over these accounts at tariff rate will mean unimaginable losses.As it is, I heard SP is not accepting accounts beyond a certain kwh usage.

The customers of the retailers who exit are now caught in a bind. Their existing contracts which have not run out are at half the price today. Not only will they see their energy cost double, as of this writing, many are in a jam as they are unable to find a a provider willing to accept new accounts.

The solution?

What the industry is facing is a black swan event for which the supplier of last resort safety net was not designed to cover.

All top guns are meeting round-the-clock to sort out the crisis, no doubt about it. How will this be resolved? This is essentially a retailer liquidity crisis, the solution for which is credit facilities.



 If you like what you read here, subscribe to my blog and you will get notified by email of new articles. I write from unorthordox viewpoints you may not have heard elsewhere. That's the fun in blogging as far as I'm concerned.

 

at 6 comments:

Friday, October 15, 2021

Open Letter To MTF To Adopt The Uttar Pradesh Model To Stop Pandemic

Open letter to the Ministerial Multi-Task Force handling the pandemic:

To: Mr Ong Ye Kung, Minister for Health
      Mr Lawrence Wong, Minister for Finance
      Mr Gan Kim Yong, Minister for Trade & Ind

Sirs,

I am a senior citizen. I have had 2 visits from teams from the Community Centre/ People's Assn to check on my vaccination status. Many have commented on social media depicting such visits as the govt trying to force up the vaccination numbers by coercing the seniors. I can attest this is certainly not true. They were courteous and just enquired if I needed assistance to go for the jab. At no time did they try to impose on me. I appreciate the outreach is concern by officialdom for the elderlies.

My opener is to show I understand the concerns, not just for elderlies but for the country generally. I can also understand the slip ups here and there, the lock-downs and the changing regulations. I avoid being a couch potato critic (there are many) on these matters as it's not easy walking in your shoes.

Sirs, I know there is no template to manage the stochastic dynamic situation, but the whack-a-mole approach does not appear to lead anywhere. It is time to think and act out-of-the-box. Actually several states have already done so. We should learn and adapt from their models. More specifically I am referring to Uttar Padesh. To change course and adopt a new strategy, I think we need to re-align policy parameters.

Firstly - WHO has proven themselves to be compromised by Bill Gates and big pharma donations. The latest incident is the Uttar Pradesh experiment. The successful Uttar Pradesh programme to flatten the curve was conducted together with a WHO team. Yet with the first hand knowledge gained, WHO made no attempt to replicate the Indian model elsewhere. Stop the over-reliance on WHO.

Secondly - The US is totally discredited. The CDC, FDA, Dr Fauci, the American media, University and Scientific papers, they are all totally corrupted by their toxic politics. US VAERS data are absolutely untrustworthy. From the very beginning, I have wondered where did the annual hundreds of thousands of flu death numbers go to? The Biden admin is prepared to go the edge of the cliff to stay in the White House. They are now saying the unvaccinated is a danger to everyone when the data says this is simply not true. The idea is to push out the narrative the unvaccinated are to be blamed for everything, setting them up as scapegoat for a failed economy. They made a faux approval of Comirnatty to push the vaccination mandate. I see that your team is apeing the discrimination of the unvaccinated based on false science, and believing in an approved Comirnatty which is not available anywhere.We should steer clear of the US.

Thirdly - Millions of Covid sufferers saved cannot be wrong. Every medical professional that rejected Ivermectin referred to negative studies and ignored so many peer-reviewed studies that say otherwise. These naysayers are wrong either (1) their studies relied only on Ivermectin whereas MDs use Ivermectin in a cocktail with other drugs such as zinc, or (2) they criticise the positive studies on grounds of invalid test for lack of controlled group with placebos. But the reason for not having such a control group is because it is morally unacceptable to provide placebos to Covid patients who needed treatment. Officialdom in all countries seem to be behind the curve on Ivermectin. Take for example, Malaysia's Ministry of Health is doing their own clinical trial on Ivermectin and they will make a decision after that. But the strange thing is in the ministerial announcement for the clinical trial, they described Ivermectin as a horse dewormer. Officialdom seems to be living in the kampongs, as far as Ivermectin is concerned.

It is so strange that no other drug in the world has ever had so much push back against it. How much of these underhand efforts are funded by big pharma, one should wonder. I'm thinking Ivermectin's dirt cheap price has something to do with this. Big pharma, including Pfizer, are all in the race for a Covid pill. I believe 2 have now applied to FDA for emergency use authorisation. Both have 50% efficacy rates. I believe Singapore is doing clinical trials on Merck's molnupiravir. So here we go again, the whole world ready to put blind faith in untested new drugs. Why have faith in these untested drugs when Ivermectin has already been used safely and successfully? And the joke is, these new drugs would certainly be copying some of the functionalities of Ivermectin. I can smell a scam 1 mile away.It is high time Singapore officialdom pay more respect to Ivermectin.

The Uttar Pradesh model:

I come now to the cruz of my message. I urge the government to eject the whack-a-mole approach and consider the Uttar Pradesh model. Few weeks after they used Ivermectin, the Indians flattened the curve. There is almost zero case now. If I were the health minister, I would have immediately made a zoom call to my counterpart in Uttar Pradesh 2 months ago to learn from them.

Uttar Pradesh is 243,000 km2 in size, a huge population of 200 million and very low budget. How did they bring their cases down from 100,000 a day to zero in 2-3 weeks? Just 3 key indicators:
1. Early treatment is key.
2. Therapeutic protocol that includes Ivermectin pills and a few other drugs like zinc. They went for the cure instead of focusing on the prevention.
3. Be proactive rather than reactive - Go out to the people instead of waiting for them to come to the hospital.

The health ministry worked with WHO. They formed thousands of outreach teams and went into all their towns, cities, villages, every outlying home. Every men, women and children were tested. Those positive but not serious cases were given a package with a cocktail of drugs that included Ivermectin, an oximeter. They were taught to self-isolate and  self-administer the drugs. Serious cases go to hospital.

It worked remarkably well for them. And the package handed out cost less than S$5.00 each.

If Uttar Pradesh can do a 100% outreach to 200 million people in matters of weeks, it will be a cinch for Singapore.

Dr Peter McCullough:

I urge you to invest a few minutes to watch this video. It's a recent presentation by Dr Peter McCullough to the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists. Dr. McCullough is a cardiologist and was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University. McCullough is editor-in-chief of the journals Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiorenal Medicine. He was and is an advocate for early COVID-19 treatment that included hydroxychloroquine.

Here, Dr. McCullough gave an extensive rundown on everything Covid-19 vaccines, from safety and efficacy to the fraudulent “approval” of the Pfizer vaccine. Valued information like this never see the light of day in American mainstream media.


WINNING THE WAR AGAINST THERAPEUTIC NIHILISM AND THE RUSH TO REPLACE TRUSTED TREATMENTS WITH UNTESTED NOVEL THERAPIES.
A most authoritative presentation of the existential threat to mankind today.
Please share with all your friends. Everyone needs to know.

Finally allow me to close with a short anecdote. This was narrated to me by someone who heard it from an insider. One of our famous property magnate, the late Mr Ng Teng Fong, once interviewed an applicant for the post of accountant. His panel of executives were surprised when his opening question to the interviewee was "Do you know how much a pound of 2 inch nails cost?" The moral of the story is this. Mr Ng had no formal education, he communicated in the Hokkien dialect. Although he appreciated education, he valued managers with real ground level exposures.

It is high time we pay attention to the medical practitioners who have been treating their patients successfully with cocktail drugs that included Ivermectin, and those who have walked the grounds and flattened their curves in their own way when vaccines have clearly failed them. Blind conviction in an untested novel biotechnology that has failed is as dangerous as the Flat Earthers.

Thank you and may God bless you with the wisdom to lead the country well in this pandemic.

Yours faithfully

Patrick Low 


Related blogs :

at 4 comments:

Thursday, October 14, 2021

You May Be A Walking Antenna - The Secret Materials Inside You

"Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that [world population] by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent" .....Bill Gates
"The elderly are useless eaters" .... Henry Kissinger

Big Tobacco lied for 40-50 years that cigarette smoking does not cause cancer. If you think they won't lie about vaccines, watch the short clip above and do your own research.

Some 20 years ago when most people had never heard of nanotechnology, I was following its nascent development closely. More specifically, I followed the work done in Israel, looking for commercial opportunities. Ten years later, Israel established itself as the country at the forefront of this exciting technology. At the time I was also following Temasek's investment and wondered why the SWF was missing in action in Israel in the early days. Today, almost every electronic gadget has some Israeli technology in it.  20 years ago, as I was trying to understand nanotechnology, with its fullerenes, nanotubes, quantum mechanics, and other stuff beyond my comprehension, I was immediately struck by the fear of an existential danger it imposes. What if an industrial accident occurs and nanoparticles are dispersed into the air. Nanoparticles can penetrate the human skin or breathed in. What physiological damage will it cause? How was I to know that today, my fear is materialising. not from an industrial accident but pharmaceutical vaccines.

Those who have vaccinated with Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazenaca, Johnson & Johnson vaccines and are cussing at the unvaccinated, I suggest you write to Ministry Of Health and ask them for a complete list of ingredients in the vaccines. MOH will never be able to respond because they do not know.

I'm astounded that people never want to find out just what it is they are pumping into their bodies with novel technology. Governments put blind faith in WHO and science not yet fully understood, and the masses put blind faith in their governments. Some ingredients of the vaccines are trade secrets. Bill Gates and Big Pharma fought hard to retain Intellectual Property. I suppose if you are big donors to WHO, you have certain privileges to call the shots. This is in contravention of the Nuremberg Code on vaccines which requires that all ingredients be made public. Concealing the ingredients is a humanitarian crime. MOH, albeit innocently, becomes part of the cabal that is perpetuating a humanitarian crime in pushing vaccination without telling people what they are injecting inside their bodies.

Reports are surfacing from medical practitioners and operators of blood laboratories, of strange things they are seeing in the blood of their very sick patients. They are also reeling in horror at what they see in the vaccines under a normal microscope. The first few medical professionals who made public what they have seen have been ridiculed, ostracised and blocked out by media and their fellow professionals. But the momentum of these discoveries have grown. There is now a consortium of hundreds of these professions who formed a group called the Coronavirus Committee Conference. They now have 35 groups from many countries and recently held a conference when they called for world governments to stop the vaccination immediately. Of course you won't hear about this. Nor will you hear of other similar groups of concerned practitioners such as FLCCC. No mainstream media will report on it.

Basically, these doctors are seeing unusual formation in the blood of those who have been vaccinated, and strange particles in the vaccines that are inorganic and metallic particles, that move in some patterns, as well as parasites. None of these have any reason to be in a vaccine. These doctors are reporting  what they see, what they know, what they don't understand. MOH needs to look into these with the greatest of urgency.

These new nanotechnology vaccines use very very tiny particles. To get a sense of perspective, the diameter of a human hair is about 90,000 nanometers (nm); 1,000 nm = 1 micron. We are dealing with particles that's measured in nm. The images displayed here are of different magnification, different techniques of image capture, so they may appear different.

Fig. 1. This is how normal healthy red blood cells (RBC) look like. Colour, shape and size are even.  Each is about 7 microns in diameter. Each cell moves independently.


What they saw in the blood:

Fig.2. Some examples of blood of the vaccinated.

What they saw in the vaccine:


Fig 3.1 This is from a drop of the vaccine, in aqueous state. It is obviously engineered. They are connected (can see this if magnified further). It moves and is self-structured. People familiar with this were quick to say it's graphene oxide.
Fig 3.2 When left to dry, the structure of Fig. 3.1 transformed to rib-like form.
Fig 3.3 This is the same Fig 3.1 in the drop of vaccine in low magnification.

Fig 4  Metallic and parasitic forms seen in aqueous state.


Both mRNA and adenovirus vector vaccines use novel nanotechnology in their production. It is obvious the delivery mechanism of nano particles must be contributing to some of the queer images. So I googled hard for some scientist with knowledge in biochemical, nanotechnology, various microscopy analytics knowledge who may have made some reports. I came across a Dr Robert Young who calls himself a naturopathic practitioner who has a non-Pasteur world view of virus. He seems to have a colourful past with quite a few negative articles on him. Or are the bad guys at work wrecking those who have alternative views? I concern myself only with the work he has done in trying to throw light on what's in the vaccines and what is happening to the blood of the vaccinated. 


Dr Robert Young used a host of instrumentation that includes Optical Microscopy, Bright-Field Microscopy, pHase Contrast Microscopy, Dark-Field Microscopy, UV absorbance and Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Transmission Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments to verify the vaccine morphologies and contents. 

Images of red blood cells (RBC) from Dr Robert Young:

Fig.5. Micrograph of normal healthy state of red blood cells viewed under Phase Contrast Microscopy. 



Fig.6.  Micrograph of live blood 24 hours after the mRNA vaccination taken under Phase Contrast Microscopy.  Shows biological transformations of red and white blood cells taking place, red blood cells crystallized, large symplasts of graphene oxide crystals are seen in the center and Orotic acid crystals in the upper right hand corner of the micrograph. In simple terms, the vaccine impacts the blood within hours of the jab.



Fig.7. A pHase Contrast Microscopy view at 1500x of live unstained blood of a vaccinated person. The dark patch is a carbon cluster of Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) as seen in Fig.3.3. RBC are clotting in and around the rGO crystal in the condition known as Rouleau (RBC stacking up like coins).


Fig.8. A nanotube of reduced Graphene Oxide rDO in coagulated RBC or a blood clot in vaccinated person viewed under pHase Contrast Microscopy . 
Fig.9. Looking at what's inside a blood clot. 
View of a nanotube and microtubes of Graphene Oxide in the Dried Coagulated Blood Cells or a Blood Clot under bright field  Microscopy. Also seen are parasite bulges expressed in the cross-linked fibrin monomers indicating a systemic parasitical infection.
Fig.10. Dried blood clot of normal blood (unvaccinated) and abnormal (vaccinated). In normal blood where there are no graphene or iron oxide, no parasites, no pollymerised protein pools, the dried blood cells look like the left image. The right image is a dried blood clot of a vaccinated person showing white  circles indicating cellular degeneration due to the impurities.


Images of Graphene Oxide in vaccines by Dr Robert Young:

Fig. 11. A 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) and an unidentified parasite (lower right)


Fig.12. A 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a symplast of graphene oxide (upper left) next to a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite (lower right)


Fig.13. A 0.5ml aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample viewed under pHase contrast microscopy at 1000x, showing a graphene oxide ribbon. 



Fig.14. Aqueous fraction images containing reduced graphene oxide from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated  reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical pHase contrast microscopy, 600X magnification.

Fig.15. (A) Shows X ray Diffraction Pattern of the Graphene Particles. Characterization of graphene nanosheets obtained by a modified Hummer's method. 
(B) For a definitive identification of graphene by TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy), it is necessary to complement the observation with the structural characterization by obtaining a characteristic electron diffraction standard sample as the figure 'B'. The standard sample corresponding to graphite or graphene has a hexagonal symmetry, and generally has several concentric hexagons. This is the same as what doctors saw in Fig.3.1.

Fig.16. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) shows an intricate matrix or mesh of folded translucent flexible rGO sheets with a mixture of darker multilayer agglomerations and lighter colored of unfolded monolayers. The darker linear areas appear to be local overlap of sheets and local arrangement of individual sheets in parallel to the electron beam. After the mesh, a high density of unidentified rounded and elliptical clear shapes appears, possibly corresponding to holes generated by mechanical forcing of the rGO mesh during treatment. See Fig. 17.

Fig.17. TEM microscopy shows particles of rGO in a Pfizer vaccine.  The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles of rGO.  This evidence was intitially found by Muestra RD1,  and published in the La Quinta Columna Report, June 28, 2021.

Fig.18. Micro and nano particulates in the Pfizer, Moderna, Astrazeneca and Janssen vaccines analyzed under an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). I have no idea what the plastic looking thing in the middle is. The particulates here are the tiny pieces which are sharp and about 20 um in length. These are the sharp metallic particles doctors see in Fig.4. They are like debris in the vaccine.

Secret ingredient # 1: Preponderant presence of graphene:

Graphene is one of the secret ingredients of the vaccines. In fact, a high percentage of the vaccine composition is graphene. Big pharma have consistently lied that there is no graphene and if you google, you will see media and all sorts of entities attesting to the same. So how do we know there is graphene apart from the microscopy images? There are 2 other ways that confirm this.

Firstly, by analysing for chemical and elemental content using Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS)

Fig. 19. Shows the spectrum of a Pfizer vaccine nanoparticulates of graphene oxide, magnesium, aluminum, silicon, chloride and calcium  identified under an ESEM microscope coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe. (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts). This confirms there are various non-organic particulates which have no reason to be pumped into your body via a vaccine.

Second, the smoking gun lies in the vaccine delivery system. The mRNA in the vaccine is unstable ((it needs to be kept under -70 degrees C in storage) and needs to be protected in a strong delivery system. 

Fig.20.  These are liposome capsid containing rGO that Pfizer uses for its product to vehiculate the graphene oxide by attaching the liposome capsid to specific mRNA molecules for driving the liposome contents of rGO to specific organs, glands and tissues, namely the ovaries and testes, bone marrow, heart and brain. The image was obtained by a SEM-Cryo preparation.

Karen Kingston, a former Pfizer employee and current pharmaceutical analyst for the pharma and medical device industries, has done excellent investigative work and tracked where Pfizer outsourced their mRNA delivery system. Pfizer procures their liposome capsids from a company in China called Sinopeg.

Sinopeg's website publicises their product under Covid-19 Exipients. It's the delivery mechanism Pfizer deploys. Sinopeg uses functionalised graphene and PEGylated lipids. This is a 100% confirmation that graphene is present in the vaccines, all 4 of them.

Secret ingredient # 2 - Presence of Parasites:

Fig 21. Shows Trypanosoma  cruzi Parasitea in live blood under a pHase Contrast Microscopy Micrograph. 




Fig.22. This shows a Trypanosoma Parasite  approximately 50 microns in length found in Pfizer vaccine. It is composed of carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen



Fig.23. Under an ESEM microscope coupled with an EDS x-ray microprobe. (X axis =KeV, Y axis = Counts) the presence of the parasite in Fig 22 is a composition of nano particulates including carbon, oxygen chromium, sulphur, aluminum, chloride and nitrogen found in the Covid vaccines.

Secret ingredient # 3 - Presence of unknown organic particles:

Fig.24. Shows an organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of bismuth, titanium. vanadium. iron, copper, silicon, aluminum embedded in Pfizer vaccine.


Fig.25. Shows the composition of the unknown organic material in Fig. 24 is an aggregate of Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen, embedded in nanoparticles of bismuth, titanium. vanadium. iron, copper, silicon, aluminum embedded in Pfizer vaccine.


Secret ingredient # 4 - Presence of unknown inorganic aggregates:

Fig.26. An engineered metallic aggregate seen in Astrazeneca vaccine. 



Fig.27. Shows the composition of the metallic aggregate in fig.26 under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified (EDS) with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy System. It shows composition of iron, chromium and nickel also known as stainless steel.

This test also shows presence of molecules of histidine, sucrose, Poly-ethylene glycol (PEG) and ethylene alcohol, also contained in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.

Fig.28. Shows an organic-inorganic aggregate identified in the Janssen vaccine. The particles are composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue” of reduced graphene oxide.  This aggregate is highly magnetic and can trigger pathological blood coagulation.   




Fig.29. Shows the composition of the organic-inrganic aggregate in fig.28 under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified (EDS) with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy System. It shows Carbon , Oxygen,  Iron and Nickel held together with Graphene Oxide.

Secret ingregient # 5 - What appears like nanodots :

Fig.30. According to Dr Young, this is a nanobot of graphene oxide found in Moderna vaccine. There are nanobots of other shapes and sizes in all the vaccine.

Fig.31. Shows the composition of the suspected nanobot in fig.30 under Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and quantified (EDS) with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy System. It shows carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, silicon, lead, cadmium, and selenium present together with rGO.


What are the risks of all these secret ingredients:

 
Parasites:
    
There is no reason for parasites to be in a vaccine, period.  It appears and is identified anatomically as a Trypanosoma cruzi parasite of which several variants are lethal and is one of many causes of acquired immune deficiency syndrome or AIDS. Alarm bells should be ringing. One of the first to submit a report in a medical journal on the viru genome were a group of Indian scientists who said in early Jan 2010 that there is an uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag. (They were discredited and forced to take down the publication. But now it seems they were right). One should also be alarmed that Dr Ralph Baric, a leading actor in the Wuhan Lab research, has spoken many times about how easy it is to create a chimeric by inserting some parts of a bat virus onto a HIV virus backbone. The only logical reason parasites are in the vaccines is lab contamination. What does it mean to have AIDs causing parasites in your body? I have no idea.


Nanobots:

Imagine a tiny little construction so small that can be injected into your body and programmed to go somewhere and do some stuff. That's no longer science fiction. The technology exist today. Nanobots are robotics at the nanometer size of 1-10 microns. It can come with sensors and powered by electromagnetic fields (EMF). Is that what's really going on that these are really Smart Vaccines?

Personally I'm not sold on the idea that these are nanobots for reasons of cost. Marc Miskin of Cornell University have demonstrated they have the manufacturing capabilities now, but there does not appear to have commercial application yet. But I certainly would give an arm to know what the heck these things are and what are they doing in my body.

Note the least of concerns is the presence of cadmium selenide in these 'nanobots'. Cadium selenide nanoparticles are highly cytotoxic (toxic to cells) and genotoxic (toxic to DNA) They all lied about the vaccines not capable of changing our DNA. But these chemical can damage DNA which means actual genetic change. What will happen to the progenity of folks who have vaccinated?


Graphene oxcide :

We come now to the main ingredient in the aqueous potpourri of the vaccines - graphene oxcide.

Whenever you see 'pegylated', you need to be aware of the good and the bad. Pegylation is the addition of polyethylene glycol to a biological compound to be protected from destruction by the immune system. In this way, it helps to increase the half-life of the biological compound, in this case, the mRNA of the vaccines. These mRna are enclosed in the pegylated capsids.

Pegylation has shown to improve drugs in 3 ways - Enhance drug stability, improve pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic properties. Nanomaterials such as graphene bear an intrinsic capacity to activate the immune system, depending on their functionalization. Thus Pegylated systems, and other nano-particle based systems in general, have emerged as a novel drug delivery system, imaging and biosensors. As of today, about 30 drugs using such systems have been approved by FDA.

This technology have been actively studied, especially in drug targeting, but the focus is only in the therapeutic effects. On the other hand, toxicological and immunological concerns are of lesser or no interest to big pharma.  

Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity. Together with its material strength, graphene oxide has become widely used due to its biocompatibilty. There are however, many other findings that indicate the dangers of PEGylated graphene oxide nanosheets (nGO-PEGs). It stimulates potent cytokine responses in peritoneal macrophages. And this is exactly what we are seeing in some people who have taken the vaccines. They suffer the vaccine adverse event of cytokine storm, which is actually a case of a person being attacked or killed by their own immune system overproduction of antibodies. 

How synthetic nanomaterials interact with critical biological systems need to be adequately studied before such products can be safely utilized in humans.  There is a rush to use pegylation in drugs when all safety concerns have not been adequately studied. Both the vaccines and the pegylated delivery mechanism are rush jobs. Long term effects still unknown. 

They lied that the vaccines will remain in the arm in the area of the injection. Japanese scientists have confirmed the vaccines travel to various organs. It is one thing if Pfizer had no data. But Dr Robert Young pointed out that Pfizer used tracker isotopes in their tests which showed 78% of the nanoparticles ended up in reproductive organs (ovaries and testes) about 10% goes to the bone marrows and 10% to the brains.  They actually knew all along. (I have not independently verified this). These nanoparticles can cross the blood barrier because they are so tiny. Is it a coincidence there are many reports of bleeding vaginas, of menstrual cycle changes, and the nephew of Nikki Minaj telling her about his friend ending up with swollen testicles causing the girlfriend to break off their wedding. Long term effects are unknown but some scientists warned of high increase in cancer, Alzheimer's disease, sterilisation, and birth defects. Already there have been several reports of observed increase in cancer. In Spain there are reports of babies born with queer black eyes and progeria, which is a very rare genetic disease that causes children to age rapidly. Babies were reported to crawl in the second week and almost walking in a couple of months.

Blood clot is a major problem which have been widely reported. This is in the form of Rouleau shown in Fig. 7. The red blood corpuscles (RBC) stacked up like coins. This presents a huge problem because RBC can only pass through tiny capillaries one at a time. Because RBC have difficulty getting through the capillaries, they are unable to get through the capillaries to bring oxygen to the tissues, leading to hypoxia and ultimately organ failure. The question is, how do the blood clots happen? The culprit is graphene oxcide.

I come to the part that I think is most interesting and key to a lot of health issues relating to these vaccines. All living things are electrical beings. All the atoms and molecules in our body are held together by electrical forces. All the chemical bonding and reactions and the messaging at the cellular level that goes on in our body every living second, are driven by electrical forces. We are actually extremely complicated electrical systems. Thus any interference in the electrical forces can have all sorts of consequences. 

The red blood corpuscles (RBC) all have negative polarities on the insides of the cell. Thus they flow individually as similar polarities reject each other. The condition of Rouleau, or RBCs stacking up like coins, or clotting, can only mean some of them had polarities changed. So positives-negatives attract and they stack up. The question is what is responsible for that.

Graphene has good photoconductivity which means it becomes more electrically conductive when it absorbs electromagnetic radiation. For use in the nano delivery mechanism, the graphene is functionalised which would include making it dielectric, ie insulating. It thus cannot make any electric interference once injected into your body. However, scientists are well aware of the influence of an electromagnetic field on the electronic properties of graphene. If you are exposed to an electromagnetic field (EMF), the electric properties of the graphene nanoparticulates in your body will be reactivated. The electrical conductivity of the graphene particulates cause the havoc in your body as it knock and change the polarity of RBC from negative to positive, thus causing them to attract and stick together. My short stint in an enterprise in Johor Bahru doing surface treatment of electronic parts, gave me some decent background understanding of this polarity change of materials. The polarity of the treatment material has to be changed to negative in order to stick to the substrate with positive polarity.

If you have been vaccinated, where is the danger coming from? Unfortunately, EMF is everywhere. 1G, 2G, 3G , 4G and now 5G. have covered the world in an electrmagnetic smog. You are now a walking antennae, receiving and sending signals everywhere. The closer you are to and the stronger the EMF the higher the risk to you. Putting the cellphone to your ears is going to get you. It is very dangerous to get close to some electronic equipment. Some scientists have warned about high risks in those body scanning machines. People who work in close proximity to such high EMF radiating equipment are at high risks, such as pilots. In the recent fiasco with Southwest Airlines in US, there have been reports of two separate incidents of pilots dying in flight and emergency landing was required. It is being covered up and the circumstances remain unknown. Pilots work in high EMF environment. 

The effect of the EMF on the nano graphene particulates in your body are tiny nuclear explosions. It may build over time, or a big one may come suddenly. Just pray.

A google search will tell you these are all conspiracy theories, that the body layers are so thick it will take so much more stronger electromagnetic radiation to enter your body. They ignore studies and evidence that EMF has caused a rise in cancer, autuism, bees dying, and migratory birds loosing their ways (bees and birds depend on magnetic fields for navigation). It has been well studied that data shows EMF is now a serious threat to humans.

There is tremendous amount of gaslighting going on all over the world to suppress alternative narratives of the vaccine. We are in a pandemic and fighting the virus. But it is very apparent something sinister is going on that suggests unknown forces are taking advantage of the pandemic to launch some social restructuring on a grand scale. We can see this happening in Australia, US and Europe.

Do your own research and make up your own mind. If you believe in what you read here, share the message with your friends, both the vaccinated and unvaccinated. 

May God have mercy on us all.



Related blogs :


at 2 comments: